Your message dated Tue, 15 Aug 2023 19:23:09 +0000
with message-id <e1qvzdf-00acrn...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#999953: fixed in sslh 1.20-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #999953,
regarding sslh: depends on obsolete pcre3 library
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
999953: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999953
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sslh
Severity: important
User: matthew-pcre...@debian.org
Usertags: obsolete-pcre3

Dear maintainer,

Your package still depends on the old, obsolete PCRE3[0] libraries
(i.e. libpcre3-dev). This has been end of life for a while now, and
upstream do not intend to fix any further bugs in it. Accordingly, I
would like to remove the pcre3 libraries from Debian, preferably in
time for the release of Bookworm.

The newer PCRE2 library was first released in 2015, and has been in
Debian since stretch. Upstream's documentation for PCRE2 is available
here: https://pcre.org/current/doc/html/

Many large projects that use PCRE have made the switch now (e.g. git,
php); it does involve some work, but we are now at the stage where
PCRE3 should not be used, particularly if it might ever be exposed to
untrusted input.

This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00176.html

Regards,

Matthew [0] Historical reasons mean that old PCRE is packaged as
pcre3 in Debian 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sslh
Source-Version: 1.20-1.1
Done: Bastian Germann <b...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sslh, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 999...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <b...@debian.org> (supplier of updated sslh package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 21:02:01 +0200
Source: sslh
Architecture: source
Version: 1.20-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <b...@debian.org>
Closes: 999953
Changes:
 sslh (1.20-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload
   * Drop pcre3 (Closes: #999953)
Checksums-Sha1:
 a61c5f1b2d412035e77625fcbdf38376c47d60a0 1784 sslh_1.20-1.1.dsc
 1f76509575738474ff30a2a34f89f65c57b341ab 18280 sslh_1.20-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 67116125eab2bc9a068c11ab688a53c93fbef0e0 5799 sslh_1.20-1.1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 01f6902530afeb506ade50cd7361bf1b93c208ff76c1e7ead9ca4716ed3759c1 1784 
sslh_1.20-1.1.dsc
 08a831b2f935f002ce5dc99a02a095b7cc18909e68fb8844742e0a8d4cc4dc6c 18280 
sslh_1.20-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 aecee5022168eaede446ed491da5c9e8c1fdb0f4cc95c64d27035a5db18a98ad 5799 
sslh_1.20-1.1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 c8d1609c86dff9835debc786a977f8ec 1784 net optional sslh_1.20-1.1.dsc
 c22bb52f344485e9460ccd67de300075 18280 net optional sslh_1.20-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 f38a797e090bebd50210e8a73e45555e 5799 net optional 
sslh_1.20-1.1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=JN5Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to