Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> 于2023年8月4日周五 00:33写道： > > Source: gnome-shell > Version: 44.3-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs experimental help > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-m...@lists.debian.org > User: debian-m...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: mips64el mipsel > > gnome-shell 44 builds successfully on all release architectures except > mips*el, but fails to build on mips*el. The three perf-* unit tests fail > with exit status 1 and no obvious error messages: > <https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gnome-shell&arch=mips64el&ver=44.3-1&stamp=1688819000&raw=0> > <https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gnome-shell&arch=mipsel&ver=44.3-1&stamp=1688798824&raw=0> > > At the moment this is only in experimental, but we want to upload it to > unstable soon, as part of the libmutter-12-0 transition > <https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mutter.html>. >
I will try to debug it. > Is gnome-shell practically useful on mips-based hardware, or does it > have hardware requirements that the mips family do not meet in practice? > If nobody really uses it on mips*el, it might be better to do > architecture-specific removals rather than attempting to debug and fix it. > > Or, if the mips porting team can confirm that GNOME 43 works in practice > as a desktop environment on mips*el hardware, then it would be useful Yes. There are some MIPS desktop cases. > to try GNOME 44 from experimental on the same hardware (after building > gnome-shell locally with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck) to check whether > this is a practical problem. > > Thanks, > smcv > -- YunQiang Su
