Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2023 05:49:38 +0000 with message-id <e1qotsy-008h25...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#1042284: fixed in binutils-mingw-w64 11 has caused the Debian Bug report #1042284, regarding binutils-mingw-w64: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:71: unpack] Error 1 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1042284: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042284 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: binutils-mingw-w64 Version: 10.4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20230726 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' > tar xf /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.40.90.tar.* > rm -rf /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/upstream > mv binutils-* /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/upstream > patch -d /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/upstream -R -p1 < > /usr/src/binutils/patches/001_ld_makefile_patch.patch > patching file ld/Makefile.am > patching file ld/Makefile.in > Hunk #1 succeeded at 575 (offset 2 lines). > QUILT_SERIES=debian/patches/series QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches quilt push -a > Applying patch debian/patches/testsuite-timeout.patch > patching file upstream/gas/testsuite/lib/gas-defs.exp > > Applying patch debian/patches/specify-timestamp.patch > patching file upstream/bfd/peXXigen.c > Hunk #2 succeeded at 840 (offset -10 lines). > patching file upstream/ld/pe-dll.c > Hunk #2 succeeded at 1232 (offset 2 lines). > patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pe.em > Hunk #1 succeeded at 345 (offset 7 lines). > patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pep.em > Hunk #1 succeeded at 390 (offset 9 lines). > > Applying patch debian/patches/dont-run-objcopy.patch > patching file upstream/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp > Hunk #1 succeeded at 702 (offset -1 lines). > > Applying patch debian/patches/disable-flags.patch > patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pe.em > Hunk #1 succeeded at 286 (offset 7 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 387 (offset 7 lines). > patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pep.em > Hunk #1 succeeded at 399 (offset 9 lines). > > Applying patch debian/patches/reproducible-import-libraries.patch > patching file upstream/ld/pe-dll.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 2971 (offset 47 lines). > > Applying patch debian/patches/pr30079.patch > patching file upstream/ld/ldlang.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 649. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file upstream/ld/ldlang.c > Patch debian/patches/pr30079.patch can be reverse-applied > make[1]: *** [debian/rules:71: unpack] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/07/26/binutils-mingw-w64_10.4_unstable.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20230726;users=lu...@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20230726&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: binutils-mingw-w64 Source-Version: 11 Done: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of binutils-mingw-w64, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1042...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> (supplier of updated binutils-mingw-w64 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 07:18:48 +0200 Source: binutils-mingw-w64 Architecture: source Version: 11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> Changed-By: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> Closes: 1042284 Changes: binutils-mingw-w64 (11) unstable; urgency=medium . * In preparation for binutils 2.41, drop pr30079.patch, merged upstream. Closes: #1042284. Checksums-Sha1: 1e9313faaa0eb6efec505a1b8c5386b1c5225cab 1890 binutils-mingw-w64_11.dsc 65224988078be6f47b433c7eccb8bdfbef4cd76e 10400 binutils-mingw-w64_11.tar.xz 66dc77f87b971705becc48f9830dbab6c9b0bd83 7599 binutils-mingw-w64_11_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 77c1bfd5840a358198d30325ea3cafbbe1f812a73f988f55ddad40a8c8c1885c 1890 binutils-mingw-w64_11.dsc e949330067195db38d2f7b69dcdbaeb29af5735160956ea9e7d23aeb1fd9e636 10400 binutils-mingw-w64_11.tar.xz d3dcbb4c2af8be1cc5e312fbfe6e1ce7c05a45e95e1af820e2eb56eacdda9ea4 7599 binutils-mingw-w64_11_source.buildinfo Files: c75221bfc7140c97fe598218568cf216 1890 devel optional binutils-mingw-w64_11.dsc 21164fbbf01232e06fd44bbc6e59e6f4 10400 devel optional binutils-mingw-w64_11.tar.xz 6adbfdd2f193e0b0e67f2bafef40cc4f 7599 devel optional binutils-mingw-w64_11_source.buildinfo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEnPVX/hPLkMoq7x0ggNMC9Yhtg5wFAmTB/mEACgkQgNMC9Yht g5zSBA/+OUK3rurwuhFOfHmGfq1w50aEYbDR4p0dDPFfAmmukKI2qsb+uk7mNF0b 0R0pBBxRRCmDT2BhGnm4KnXEoRVWFwr04e0AlbH3dNhyvexU3GyZjXXBjokCGzRU vTCnHV1OU3eJAwf0BAZZEyt48yrRXrvAsYVP/xo6seLSoKYB91Gfa1Xl665pe+kP v4AkO8qNy2yd3uMWQU3EZvnL8sRaZab5lATPYHpffP4Oss/jetVgB/h+vVjeX/1C 5ZdVNIBKcLhH8BTDQv/skbmxp0z34EKtoIp/otFlq93FyI9/et7oZTknKLfZxex1 zoI3q3iJrZlN2RSD/qqLKWoWY9Xag8TqcMGcMHiwOrxiwrYuJ+wRG+UOHO56zMqW vk0QM7GSbqoNZXPPGhmxYEQUI0bSKv+Mg8kWxn3z2O0CheIIt3op1NKLfgUVCXeL vm1bpVhc0gVPxW/FUF0VGowVb0+jgQWpakDd/eEHJhM5WzG0EcmL23mAABtxOGyR JFaLy53myk9NxVvbAtbho+LqLSKmsSnUO8ANSiXbzXO9ayUgy6PXg7skO/BXoHOa JSH0t2Rkwe2bcMiWPVNyNaWHMm9ibPfIUxFHBkucR0KWU78utnafg9KPjd0PWV8Y S0fGDac6Z/dbEA4MEPXn3ME5NiNvbWPWpkVULcAtXv4xs+fWMfo= =bx5g -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
