Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 13:49:29 +0000
with message-id <e1pze0x-003jyf...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#999047: fixed in poco-doc 1.3.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #999047,
regarding poco-doc: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or 
build-indep
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
999047: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999047
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: poco-doc
Version: 1.3.6-1.1
Severity: important
Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
Tags: bookworm sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep

Dear maintainer,

Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be
affected by this issue.

This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html .
The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month.

Best,

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: poco-doc
Source-Version: 1.3.6-2
Done: Bastian Germann <b...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
poco-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 999...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <b...@debian.org> (supplier of updated poco-doc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 15:23:41 +0200
Source: poco-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <b...@debian.org>
Closes: 965782 999047
Changes:
 poco-doc (1.3.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Update debhelper compat to 7. (Closes: #965782)
   * Add missing rules targets. (Closes: #999047)
   * Convert to source format 3.0 (quilt).
Checksums-Sha1:
 59456cc55e4179ad2fa9e1e16c83944658168706 1559 poco-doc_1.3.6-2.dsc
 c05355ddf0d013ebba4af20dff4215bb78782f59 2616 poco-doc_1.3.6-2.debian.tar.xz
 31723be24d7c98200d302218b699664fc9562428 5440 poco-doc_1.3.6-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 2efc94f9988d555769bf7dac2304d6166cb23e03dba1d27d307b9153be13c2a0 1559 
poco-doc_1.3.6-2.dsc
 6057f06ac1a4b7be2343ae9b4f1abcf54eb9d597b69b1d7012831ebec6192078 2616 
poco-doc_1.3.6-2.debian.tar.xz
 df2d8d31ceab5f311a3c26f7b1df26e631c1c22508aa5b96c2df90d3a645a012 5440 
poco-doc_1.3.6-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 bd6b6d202abbb197f81217e54e1282b2 1559 doc extra poco-doc_1.3.6-2.dsc
 463b515daaefeb72e435eb95e32efb3e 2616 doc extra poco-doc_1.3.6-2.debian.tar.xz
 b60aa337ca29c2301d9d358854f34aef 5440 doc extra 
poco-doc_1.3.6-2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=5yWp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to