On 21 April 2023 at 10:51, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 21 April 2023 at 16:23, Simon McVittie wrote: | | Source: r-base | | Version: 4.3.0-1 | | Severity: serious | | Justification: maintainer presumably considers this version to be unsuitable for bookworm | | | | > r-base (4.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium | | > . | | > * New upstream release (into 'experimental' while Debian is frozen) | | | | I'm assuming that mismatch between the changelog message and the header | | wasn't intentional... | | Oh noes! That was an honest mistake. I just checked my debian-installer | (replies) folder and all my uploads since March 15 went to experimental. | | Here I just emacs shortcut'ed to 'unstable' whereas as all others I managed | to put in 'experimental'. That included a 4.3.0rc upload a few days ago. | | | Hopefully we're close enough to the release that no further uploads of | | r-base for bookworm will be necessary. | | Yes. Please advise. What is best practices now? Upload -2 to experimental? | Or not? What action would 'close' this bug? | | Also, do I need to contact the release managers to ask for a freeze on this | misfiled upload?
Come to think about it the fact that there is an open 'serious' bug on the package should be sufficient for it to not progress out of unstable. Dirk -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
