Your message dated Sun, 09 Apr 2023 06:49:13 +0000
with message-id <e1plorr-000jiw...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1033998: fixed in protobuf 3.21.12-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033998,
regarding protobof: FTBFS on 32 bit arches: error: static assertion failed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1033998: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033998
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: protobuf
Version: 3.21.12-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org, hel...@debian.org

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=protobuf&arch=i386&ver=3.21.12-2&stamp=1680729111&raw=0

g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..  -I./../third_party/googletest/googletest/include 
-I./../third_party/googletest/googlemock/include -Wdate-time 
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -pthread -DHAVE_PTHREAD=1 -DHAVE_ZLIB=1 -Wall 
-Wno-sign-compare -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. 
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c -o 
google/protobuf/protobuf_test-extension_set_unittest.o `test -f 
'google/protobuf/extension_set_unittest.cc' || echo 
'./'`google/protobuf/extension_set_unittest.cc
In file included from ./google/protobuf/implicit_weak_message.h:39,
                 from ./google/protobuf/generated_message_util.h:54,
                 from ./google/protobuf/generated_message_bases.h:40,
                 from ./google/protobuf/unittest.pb.h:26,
                 from google/protobuf/extension_set_unittest.cc:39:
./google/protobuf/repeated_field.h: In instantiation of ‘constexpr int 
google::protobuf::internal::RepeatedFieldLowerClampLimit() [with T = long long 
int; int kRepHeaderSize = 4]’:
google/protobuf/extension_set_unittest.cc:871:3:   required from here
./google/protobuf/repeated_field.h:81:27: error: static assertion failed
   81 |   static_assert(sizeof(T) <= kRepHeaderSize, "");
      |                 ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./google/protobuf/repeated_field.h:81:27: note: the comparison reduces to ‘(8 
<= 4)’
./google/protobuf/repeated_field.h: In instantiation of ‘constexpr int 
google::protobuf::internal::RepeatedFieldLowerClampLimit() [with T = long long 
unsigned int; int kRepHeaderSize = 4]’:
google/protobuf/extension_set_unittest.cc:873:3:   required from here
./google/protobuf/repeated_field.h:81:27: error: static assertion failed
./google/protobuf/repeated_field.h:81:27: note: the comparison reduces to ‘(8 
<= 4)’
./google/protobuf/repeated_field.h: In instantiation of ‘constexpr int 
google::protobuf::internal::RepeatedFieldLowerClampLimit() [with T = double; 
int kRepHeaderSize = 4]’:
google/protobuf/extension_set_unittest.cc:881:3:   required from here
./google/protobuf/repeated_field.h:81:27: error: static assertion failed
./google/protobuf/repeated_field.h:81:27: note: the comparison reduces to ‘(8 
<= 4)’
make[4]: *** [Makefile:6691: 
google/protobuf/protobuf_test-extension_set_unittest.o] Error 1

While I can understand the motivation behind #103398, please test such
changes during the freeze in experimental first.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: protobuf
Source-Version: 3.21.12-3
Done: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) <g...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
protobuf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1033...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) <g...@debian.org> (supplier of updated protobuf 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2023 05:50:55 +0000
Source: protobuf
Architecture: source
Version: 3.21.12-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) <g...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) <g...@debian.org>
Closes: 1033998
Changes:
 protobuf (3.21.12-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix build-time tests on 32 bit architectures (closes: #1033998).
Checksums-Sha1:
 e50c29ae65def31a413067abdf5a90352cb28896 3074 protobuf_3.21.12-3.dsc
 c3d325aaf807949034e749a2c81af5de9c8d10c7 34232 protobuf_3.21.12-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 ed3e75b81e167182ae4def26c9491c3786748821bed98851178412399e2c6512 3074 
protobuf_3.21.12-3.dsc
 531979ef0d5a84cb089cafbb6e2313caf585e8d3a0eb154036f73d7e72f63a89 34232 
protobuf_3.21.12-3.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 d8e34e7b07473c6903f9d245934524fb 3074 devel optional protobuf_3.21.12-3.dsc
 f457e44218a7d4cc7b7ab0ed696096e3 34232 devel optional 
protobuf_3.21.12-3.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Ai/J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to