Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2023 15:05:11 +0000
with message-id <e1ptlfx-00eay5...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1018811: fixed in pyfai 0.21.3+dfsg1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1018811,
regarding pyfai: autopkgtest regression on armel and i386
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1018811: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018811
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pyfai
Version: 0.21.3+dfsg1-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression

Hi Maintainer

The autopkgtests of pyfai have regressed on armel and i386 [1][2],
where they passed previously (see results of e.g. 0.20.0+dfsg1-3).  I
have copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.

These test failures are known upstream, as can be seen in the
following code snippets.

pyFAI/test/test_histogram.py:
@unittest.skipIf(UtilsTest.low_mem, "test unreliable on 32bits processor")
def test_count_csr(self):

pyFAI/test/test_histogram.py:
@unittest.skipIf(UtilsTest.low_mem, "test unreliable on 32bits processor")
def test_numpy_vs_cython_vs_csr_2d(self):

pyFAI/test/test_csr.py:
@unittest.skipIf(UtilsTest.low_mem, "test unreliable on 32bits processor")
def test_2d_nosplit(self):

This was noticed in Ubuntu, when the upload of glibc 2.36 caused the
same tests to start failing on armhf.

Regards
Graham


[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pyfai/unstable/armel/
[2] https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pyfai/unstable/i386/


======================================================================
FAIL: test_count_csr (pyFAI.test.test_histogram.TestHistogram2d)
Test that the pixel count and the total intensity is conserved
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pyFAI/test/test_histogram.py",
line 339, in test_count_csr
    self.assertTrue(delta == 0, msg="check all pixels were counted")
AssertionError: False is not true : check all pixels were counted

======================================================================
FAIL: test_numpy_vs_cython_vs_csr_2d (pyFAI.test.test_histogram.TestHistogram2d)
Compare numpy histogram with cython simple implementation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pyFAI/test/test_histogram.py",
line 373, in test_numpy_vs_cython_vs_csr_2d
    self.assertTrue(delta_max <= self.err_max_cnt, "pixel count
difference numpy/csr : max delta=%s" % delta_max)
AssertionError: False is not true : pixel count difference numpy/csr :
max delta=8.0

======================================================================
FAIL: test_2d_nosplit (pyFAI.test.test_csr.TestCSR)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pyFAI/test/test_csr.py", line
195, in test_2d_nosplit
    self.assertLess(error.mean(), 1e-3, "img are almost the same")
AssertionError: 244.15215998872887 not less than 0.001 : img are almost the same

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 376 tests in 285.382s

FAILED (failures=3, skipped=10)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pyfai
Source-Version: 0.21.3+dfsg1-3
Done: Roland Mas <lola...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pyfai, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1018...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roland Mas <lola...@debian.org> (supplier of updated pyfai package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 15:28:05 +0100
Source: pyfai
Architecture: source
Version: 0.21.3+dfsg1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian PaN Maintainers 
<debian-pan-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net>
Changed-By: Roland Mas <lola...@debian.org>
Closes: 1018811
Changes:
 pyfai (0.21.3+dfsg1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Andreas Tille ]
   * Team upload.
   * Fix watch file
   * Fetch upstream patch to skip tests that are unreliable on 32-bit platforms
     by default
     Closes: #1018811
   * Standards-Version: 4.6.2 (routine-update)
   * Rules-Requires-Root: no (routine-update)
 .
   [ Roland Mas ]
   * Team upload.
Checksums-Sha1:
 1b5c9cd007c179c858e3c8b58147f3d0ba5a28c2 2767 pyfai_0.21.3+dfsg1-3.dsc
 8e4812a1765376085ce1aae04ff1dc4c49445245 33428 
pyfai_0.21.3+dfsg1-3.debian.tar.xz
 ed80e5db4c72152787606c5c11860b1f6302c902 19518 
pyfai_0.21.3+dfsg1-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 801a3bb879a832bb73196414f7a4eb55fbdedc39ce185bbbdc26d0f5072aecb7 2767 
pyfai_0.21.3+dfsg1-3.dsc
 f7faec4d36926baf1ae49e31c1a00458308e4897d74446a26dc3c9a0e1a23e55 33428 
pyfai_0.21.3+dfsg1-3.debian.tar.xz
 9bae39aa5e562aa3339d6bac7922627687a54320c99eeaa7d6383319c42c9755 19518 
pyfai_0.21.3+dfsg1-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 5d3ca2dabdf34577699e0b27f88f8d21 2767 science optional pyfai_0.21.3+dfsg1-3.dsc
 4e4e5fa60485d896fcd7dc6c8d1d3b88 33428 science optional 
pyfai_0.21.3+dfsg1-3.debian.tar.xz
 71f1320d18cbb87b7c388cd69bfd6510 19518 science optional 
pyfai_0.21.3+dfsg1-3_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEtBU2D1kett1zr/uD0w3s0lmTIvwFAmPyNscACgkQ0w3s0lmT
Ivz6YRAAmyCSqlJ84JCb71t3Opb7QzPjTYoGAWtc/DRR3j7vnCytkpv3GeioFfqL
YCVU09/DALIhJiZ6leU1QmHUjxnhGXbdqDglh50CxkVT9TAuJbV77fmikQFaMzSK
PjeeXF8aFzw7GvH39GpQ7RI4mMn24DjepAlU8vVWmu347T3WHwdEAnhlHNECnva2
UiyqJ6zjxrZH97SgMC/mNvsNkFdWSSOh7GvDDtvMBBWAmEnp+0UVL/tqIsAUdybH
XbIhTLWSUdxStF9awcCFPW2kuuljotKZSgXSUtjDX+bUeJCpfeEeqWWnDG7ONk9m
6T8WeI+TY1nvehgLWPW5Tza+zBb8EiLCdyGrDwfVTjD0aeyLjuKCDiPzCpMTmNiD
BGMhj9nS5IL2cBT1O1Bv1jRnRGZumPTFqOgTaXMBx8AqEMMahzQDENF4/IWeD/uO
NPAuV0CFwin7Xv1wIBRDpJ8+g2JjtCIdpPjb35/DYrTDwImyvCAC1jWApjslhnXA
xj4Biv0T/majvnTZGyWGBkUSkoZP9pUAuvhsnXlHPdsqxvlszWnOQTuhvzh/sNXj
UsoIBBH7FTe9JYV430G6tLKsTbxla5YRlmz0vLY9JZlN2kM4ND98nBxt5bWKc5C4
26RjB+6bHsmD42yQJkbWOml2b9qDoCrY4kHpo609CdHzg7hTFEQ=
=7qtM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to