Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2023 22:23:56 +0100
with message-id <b06e24b4-afb8-70ab-507f-7e4971c67...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: satpy/spyder-kernels: unsatisfied build dependency in
testing: python3-distributed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030921,
regarding satpy/spyder-kernels: unsatisfied build dependency in testing:
python3-distributed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1030921: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030921
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: satpy
Version: 0.39.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 src:spyder-kernels 2.4.2-1
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed from testing, but unfortunately there are multiple scenarios
where that can happen nevertheless. To uphold our social contract,
Debian requires that packages can be rebuild from source in the suite
we are shipping them, so currently this is a serious issue with your
package in testing.
Can you please investigate the situation and figure out how to resolve
it? Regularly, if the build dependency is available in unstable,
helping the maintainer of your Build-Depends to enable migration to
testing is a great way to solve the issue. If your build dependency is
gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way. dask.distributed was removed from testing because of
bug 1030096.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On 10-02-2023 08:58, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
With the soft freeze in two days it will likely need help from the
release managers to migrate.
If no other issues pop up, it will migrate to testing before the freeze.
I added a age hint.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
