Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2023 09:50:31 +0000
with message-id <e1peonx-00c7qq...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1022969: fixed in isc-dhcp 4.4.3-P1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022969,
regarding isc-dhcp-client: dhcp6 client failing to renew the IPv6 address upon 
T1 expiry.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1022969: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022969
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: isc-dhcp-client
Version: 4.4.1-2+deb10u1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,


   * What led up to the situation?
        Change the date to more than that of T1 and then  systemctl restart 
networking.service.
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
        1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN 
group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 promiscuity 0 minmtu 
0 maxmtu 0 numtxqueues 1 numrxqueues 1 gso_max_size 65536 gso_max_segs 65535
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
        2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP 
group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:0d:3a:7a:1e:a5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff promiscuity 0 minmtu 68 
maxmtu 65521 numtxqueues 64 numrxqueues 64 gso_max_size 62780 gso_max_segs 65535
    inet 10.0.0.5/24 brd 10.0.0.255 scope global eth0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 2404:f800:8000:122::4/128 scope global deprecated
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft 0sec
    inet6 fe80::20d:3aff:fe7a:1ea5/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

   * What was the outcome of this action?
        As a result, the IPv6 network communication of these VMs is 
problematic, causing business problems
   * What outcome did you expect instead?
        Renewal of the IPv6 address.
        


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.13
  APT prefers oldstable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-21-cloud-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C.UTF-8 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages isc-dhcp-client depends on:
ii  debianutils        4.8.6.1
ii  iproute2           4.20.0-2+deb10u1
ii  libc6              2.28-10+deb10u1
ii  libdns-export1104  1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u7
ii  libisc-export1100  1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u7

Versions of packages isc-dhcp-client recommends:
pn  isc-dhcp-common  <none>

Versions of packages isc-dhcp-client suggests:
pn  avahi-autoipd         <none>
pn  isc-dhcp-client-ddns  <none>
pn  resolvconf            <none>

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf changed:
option rfc3442-classless-static-routes code 121 = array of unsigned integer 8;
send host-name = gethostname();
request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, time-offset, routers,
        domain-name, domain-name-servers, domain-search, host-name,
        dhcp6.name-servers, dhcp6.domain-search, dhcp6.fqdn, dhcp6.sntp-servers,
        netbios-name-servers, netbios-scope, interface-mtu,
        rfc3442-classless-static-routes, ntp-servers;
timeout 300;


-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: isc-dhcp
Source-Version: 4.4.3-P1-1.1
Done: Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
isc-dhcp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1022...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> (supplier of updated isc-dhcp package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:15:41 +0100
Source: isc-dhcp
Architecture: source
Version: 4.4.3-P1-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian ISC DHCP Maintainers <isc-d...@packages.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org>
Closes: 1022969
Changes:
 isc-dhcp (4.4.3-P1-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Backport missing IPv6 address lifetime handling. (closes: #1022969)
Checksums-Sha1:
 9de4b21aa57b4eda809420a6683b29b842b62699 2483 isc-dhcp_4.4.3-P1-1.1.dsc
 8814a5dbe06ef87bc4fb29123c0cdcbb320aff69 99296 
isc-dhcp_4.4.3-P1-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 29d44098f9b6e7f9ca1488c765693f0cbfdd1fcf 6045 
isc-dhcp_4.4.3-P1-1.1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 b9ac9e0d226fa8c74fa108ffcc0d60f4edc899ce3601a3716cb2cee4742da8cb 2483 
isc-dhcp_4.4.3-P1-1.1.dsc
 3771dc16a418fed04100b0a34a5b920cf6d8667ec2d09159c7bd09e58248e343 99296 
isc-dhcp_4.4.3-P1-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 f3ea2be816052708aebeddced10ae55906ff732f4ac23428f20b093ca667f3a1 6045 
isc-dhcp_4.4.3-P1-1.1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 eab1cf08748defa44f4abcd62f46a1a7 2483 net important isc-dhcp_4.4.3-P1-1.1.dsc
 688646533877db72c2a529b0437617ac 99296 net important 
isc-dhcp_4.4.3-P1-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 698c42a438b92f9ccd635684f58f73d8 6045 net important 
isc-dhcp_4.4.3-P1-1.1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEER3HMN63jdS1rqjxLbZOIhYpp/lEFAmO73jcACgkQbZOIhYpp
/lEKOAf/cDYplwO59NNz0Nffzj/GXu0jX6pjsH+K2pYA5mWlbACSoPJE8hHMVP28
6RwsUY8JAQ8DVFzfzj2ZnD+wz/CRSfUs00KOoZRN8/mwr8gxTbm6IhRoFk1N8wB0
8r8dxdNuePWNyJvLOGh7Wp/hV6Ce6+P3Sq+kt9TTw39dcwOQW/HqKQ/m1BzfLElj
SOc7S8zjWXMB6eo64RXpu9OgOK78gSV8GzKnPi0t+ERYKgSBQ+umyoiVFBxldm+b
SyAmj7TdhvUPBsk2egnlGXxYeW7OqVjJ9SBFK54f3Me6C8/MYX5ZvYOihhKXXnUy
IoaorOI0liQJqdiib3MY+XqM1rbMBg==
=Gf5p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to