Hello,

On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:15:15PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 12:09:25PM +0200, Stéphane Gourichon wrote:
> > I encountered the very same symptoms as reported by Jason Cormie on a fresh 
> > Debian 3.1 install.
> > The strangest thing is that on 
> > http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/unison-gtk
> > The dependency on libgtk1.2 is there except on i386.
> > > [dep] libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.10-4) [not i386]
> > 
> > I suspect a bug in an automatic dependency calculation logic.
> > 
> > Cheers to all people involved in the Debian project !
> 
>   I don't think it is, FWIW I think it's a problem on the maintainer
> machine (here on Sylvain's presumably).
> 
>   When I rebuild unison-gtk in a clean sarge pbuilder i386 chroot, I do
> have correct dependencies:
> 
> $ dpkg --info unison-gtk_2.9.1-2sarge2_i386.deb | grep Depends
> Depends: [???] libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.10-4), [???]
> 
> 
>   So I suppose, you just have to ask the SRM for a simple binNMU of the
> package for i386.

Just FYI, here is my original message (in french, sorry) to Stephane: 

Inutile d'ouvrir un bug :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=319538

Mais il faut que je l'ouvre à nouveau.

Ce type de bug doit plus tenir à la façon dont unison pour sarge a été
généré qu'autre chose (en d'autre mot c'est un bug local qui devrait
se corriger de lui même en reconstruisant unison pour i386/sarge, donc
qui ne demande que de faire une binary upload).

Il faut que je vois ca.

Vous pouvez tout de même envoyer un bug report au bug que je vous ais
indiqué, ca permettra de le mettre un peu plus en valeur.

So i also think it only need a binNMU (binary Non Maintainer Upload) but
i would really like to know why it has lost this dependency during the
build ! (i really don't play with any custom dpkg/debhelper package).

Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall

Reply via email to