On 20221205@15:59, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> * Michele Martone <michelemart...@users.sourceforge.net> [2022-12-04 23:42]:
>
> > latex is not able to compile a rsbtest-generated file looking like the
> > one I attach. The problematic line is:
> >
> > \usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} [...]
>
> It compiles fine here:
>
> $ pdflatex test.tex > /dev/null && grep utf8x.def test.log
> (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/ucs/utf8x.def
> File: utf8x.def 2022/08/07 UCS: Input encoding UTF-8
>
> The utf8x.def file belongs to this package:
>
> $ dpkg -S /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/ucs/utf8x.def
> texlive-latex-extra: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/ucs/utf8x.def
>
> texlive-latex-extra is one of the dependencies of doxygen-latex, which is a
> build-dependency of librsb.
>
> In conclusion, I do not think that the problem is caused by using the utf8x
> option for the LaTeX package inputenc.Hi Rafael, In my 20221204@23:42 (yesterday) email I forgot to add that on my chroot setup, I can reproduce latex failing to compile the file I was attaching. In that setup I have a utf8x.def too, sized 8036 bytes and with md5sum 21f7ac37aafb6cfeddbb196b8bfd6280 . To the goal of fixing the librsb package: that test is the last one in `make tests`, and it it's just to make sure rsbtest can produce a buildable LaTeX file; it's nothing core or important, so sed'ing out that line seems the solution to me -- librsb itself is functional. Michele
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
