Your message dated Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:44:22 +0200
with message-id <Y24nhvcv4aM2GaIh@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#1021704: amanda: build dependency missing in testing
xfsdump
has caused the Debian Bug report #1021704,
regarding amanda: build dependency missing in testing xfsdump
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1021704: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021704
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: amanda
Version: 1:3.5.1-9
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertag: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting issues with your packages. Normally your build
dependencies shouldn't be removed from testing without removal all
reverse build dependencies too, nor should a package be allowed to
migrate unless all build dependencies are candidate for migration too.
However, somehow we ended up in the current state and your source
package is missing some Build-Depends for some while now. Not being able
to build from source in a suite is an RC bug in that suite.
Can you please solve the situation by either helping the maintainer of
your Build-Depends to enable migration to testing, or by working around
the lack of this build dependency?
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/index.html
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: amanda
> Version: 1:3.5.1-9
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertag: edos-uninstallable
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> Dose [1] is reporting issues with your packages. Normally your build
> dependencies shouldn't be removed from testing without removal all reverse
> build dependencies too, nor should a package be allowed to migrate unless
> all build dependencies are candidate for migration too. However, somehow we
> ended up in the current state and your source package is missing some
> Build-Depends for some while now. Not being able to build from source in a
> suite is an RC bug in that suite.
>
> Can you please solve the situation by either helping the maintainer of your
> Build-Depends to enable migration to testing, or by working around the lack
> of this build dependency?
In the meantime xfsdump migrated back to testing.
> Paul
>...
cu
Adrian
--- End Message ---
