Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2022 19:49:42 +0000
with message-id <e1orpak-00d318...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#998986: fixed in libjpeg9 1:9d-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #998986,
regarding libjpeg9: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or 
build-indep
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998986: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998986
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libjpeg9
Version: 1:9d-1
Severity: important
Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
Tags: bookworm sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep

Dear maintainer,

Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be
affected by this issue.

This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html .
The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month.

Best,

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libjpeg9
Source-Version: 1:9d-1.1
Done: Marcos Talau <ta...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libjpeg9, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 998...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marcos Talau <ta...@debian.org> (supplier of updated libjpeg9 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 16:14:38 -0300
Source: libjpeg9
Architecture: source
Version: 1:9d-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Marcos Talau <ta...@debian.org>
Closes: 998986
Changes:
 libjpeg9 (1:9d-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/rules: Add build-{arch,indep} (Closes: #998986).
Checksums-Sha1:
 189579d6b70769783c7017c70872a9b32841a87c 1824 libjpeg9_9d-1.1.dsc
 524d57787ace99d4c1ebab3ced352f1239219770 12980 libjpeg9_9d-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 a2603e0bfcc98725fdd1c034285ba24d7d5459ed 5807 libjpeg9_9d-1.1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 12dcd061f987df1a5c791fa681a9096c6938cead0dcf5e40e173f16a00c60283 1824 
libjpeg9_9d-1.1.dsc
 c72efb38c051becfd8ec027b24c9265e823dc60eb1b2ffdb85f9f03e7d07cf5c 12980 
libjpeg9_9d-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 49afdfa33e89475014e5a18cff8cb09d30ec9178bb7bf2fddaac92de90852da2 5807 
libjpeg9_9d-1.1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 b016b1ba9b0cc8619121fdda16943e49 1824 graphics optional libjpeg9_9d-1.1.dsc
 d8b7f07e1e30bffc0fced3f566de20a7 12980 graphics optional 
libjpeg9_9d-1.1.debian.tar.xz
 3ab2cad3dc25c1a79718799fc6286511 5807 graphics optional 
libjpeg9_9d-1.1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=THoE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to