Your message dated Sat, 01 Oct 2022 21:34:22 +0000
with message-id <e1oek7q-00bosl...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1002779: fixed in cdbs 0.4.163+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002779,
regarding cdbs: FTBFS: tests failed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1002779: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002779
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: cdbs
Version: 0.4.163
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211228 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> /bin/bash ./tests/testsuite -C tests      
> ## ------------------------ ##
> ## CDBS 0.4.163 test suite. ##
> ## ------------------------ ##
> 
> Package clean tests.
> 
>   1: clean most possible snippets                    FAILED (clean.at:40)
> 
> Package build tests.
> 
>   2: build with excludes                             FAILED (exclude.at:23)
>   3: build with list-missing to -data                FAILED (data.at:35)
>   4: build autotools                                 FAILED (auto.at:19)
>   5: build autotools in custom builddir              FAILED (auto-build.at:23)
>   6: build autotools in custom dirs                  FAILED 
> (auto-srcbuild.at:25)
>   7: build autotools tarball                         FAILED (auto-tar.at:25)
>   8: build autotools tarball in custom builddir      FAILED 
> (auto-tar-build.at:26)
>   9: build autotools lzma tarball                    FAILED 
> (auto-tar-lzma.at:25)
>  10: build autotools to -dbg                         FAILED (auto-dbg.at:27)
>  11: build autotools to -data,-dbg                   FAILED 
> (auto-data-dbg.at:44)
>  12: build autotools to -data,-dbg,-data-dbg         FAILED 
> (auto-datadbg.at:48)
>  13: build autotools to udeb                         FAILED (auto-udeb.at:32)
>  14: build hdparm                                    ok
>  15: build simple-patchsys                           FAILED (patchsys.at:19)
>  16: build distutils with python3                    FAILED (dist-py3.at:23)
>  17: build distutils with pypy                       FAILED (dist-pypy.at:23)
>  18: build ant                                       FAILED (ant.at:23)
> 
> ## ------------- ##
> ## Test results. ##
> ## ------------- ##
> 
> ERROR: All 18 tests were run,
> 17 failed unexpectedly.
> ## -------------------------- ##
> ## testsuite.log was created. ##
> ## -------------------------- ##
> 
> Please send `tests/testsuite.log' and all information you think might help:
> 
>    To: <build-common-hack...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
>    Subject: [CDBS 0.4.163] testsuite: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 
> 18 failed
> 
> You may investigate any problem if you feel able to do so, in which
> case the test suite provides a good starting point.  Its output may
> be found below `tests/testsuite.dir'.
> 
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:675: check-autotest-tests-testsuite] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/12/28/cdbs_0.4.163_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: cdbs
Source-Version: 0.4.163+nmu1
Done: Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cdbs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1002...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> (supplier of updated cdbs package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 22:20:04 +0200
Source: cdbs
Architecture: source
Version: 0.4.163+nmu1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: build-common team <team+build-com...@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org>
Closes: 1002779 1019975
Changes:
 cdbs (0.4.163+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Don't fail the build on the test; instead show the log (Closes: #1002779)
   * Drop !nocheck Build-Depends-Indep on pypy-dev (Closes: #1019975)
Checksums-Sha1:
 77a3dd3664f58a6c10cec651184d5daed4f00beb 1666 cdbs_0.4.163+nmu1.dsc
 2d9266e4c2e27af0fd0335e09b3725170c1e59ae 205820 cdbs_0.4.163+nmu1.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 dc84e43a4e6422b54b2d9e2ebe8ac4f74131dd8ed3c7b818702ab077a301bbd1 1666 
cdbs_0.4.163+nmu1.dsc
 e39d9936517db4552c21cd5550c92bf34bd4cb1e294a3f5a7e898c0c0937e09d 205820 
cdbs_0.4.163+nmu1.tar.xz
Files:
 bc8a02cc395c774e5ed0dd7521f8bb54 1666 devel optional cdbs_0.4.163+nmu1.dsc
 d664726b73d19a0567246df36fbbb65f 205820 devel optional cdbs_0.4.163+nmu1.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEWLZtSHNr6TsFLeZynFyZ6wW9dQoFAmMmLnUACgkQnFyZ6wW9
dQr7HQf+IyMdaXKdVFivufzJ4w0fxr6oYBdu6Q5rGWnPlzQ4cXxAuqDdGJ/TDQF4
FW0V3d8e/4K8cIlWvCnbN8D/CIA70euE5duJiPbDr4ywSBDBmEQtGdT//CN0OEl7
+D+BgztsEfcdIj71W7bb5/xYHRYyivK2nsKiqd7FesLIt7U1tkhcpnzT/8ih5aLE
OthsDw7KfYD2cbb5E6QkIvwl7jDLFWDYMtw7K/JBMkTV/HiDiPi1nOdtuwIH65SN
eHVuR929WwUXiAd0eBNzIjtwKdpjxBc0HaXXKfqdJ/XNOlTZiMI6v+hVWzPLMvR9
0og5WkzyfHqt6EGjCfcIOy2GbDyWOQ==
=iS/8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to