--- Begin Message ---
Source: xenium
Version: 0.0.2+ds-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -DDEBUG -I/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/. -isystem
> /usr/src/googletest/googletest -isystem
> /usr/src/googletest/googletest/include -g -O2
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
> -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fsanitize=thread
> -Wall -Wextra -Werror -Wno-error=cpp -std=gnu++17 -MD -MT
> CMakeFiles/gtest.dir/test/reclamation/generic_epoch_based_test.cpp.o -MF
> CMakeFiles/gtest.dir/test/reclamation/generic_epoch_based_test.cpp.o.d -o
> CMakeFiles/gtest.dir/test/reclamation/generic_epoch_based_test.cpp.o -c
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/reclamation/generic_epoch_based_test.cpp
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:41,
> from
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/detail/concurrent_ptr.hpp:11,
> from
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/lock_free_ref_count.hpp:9,
> from
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/harris_michael_list_based_set_test.cpp:1:
> In function ‘void std::atomic_thread_fence(memory_order)’,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::quiescent_state_based::thread_data::try_update_epoch(unsigned
> int, unsigned int)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/quiescent_state_based.hpp:129:33:
> /usr/include/c++/12/bits/atomic_base.h:133:26: error: ‘atomic_thread_fence’
> is not supported with ‘-fsanitize=thread’ [-Werror=tsan]
> 133 | { __atomic_thread_fence(int(__m)); }
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:41,
> from
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/detail/concurrent_ptr.hpp:11,
> from
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/hazard_pointer.hpp:9,
> from /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/kirsch_kfifo_queue_test.cpp:1:
> In function ‘void std::atomic_thread_fence(memory_order)’,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::quiescent_state_based::thread_data::try_update_epoch(unsigned
> int, unsigned int)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/quiescent_state_based.hpp:129:33:
> /usr/include/c++/12/bits/atomic_base.h:133:26: error: ‘atomic_thread_fence’
> is not supported with ‘-fsanitize=thread’ [-Werror=tsan]
> 133 | { __atomic_thread_fence(int(__m)); }
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
> In member function ‘bool std::atomic<_Tp>::compare_exchange_weak(_Tp&, _Tp,
> std::memory_order, std::memory_order) [with _Tp =
> xenium::marked_ptr<xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_control_block, 18>]’,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::mark_next(marked_ptr,
> size_t)’ at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:563:46,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_from_prev_list(marked_ptr&,
> marked_ptr, marked_ptr&)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:307:25,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove(marked_ptr)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:155:49,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_data::leave_region()’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:620:36:
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: error: failure memory model
> ‘memory_order_acquire’ cannot be stronger than success memory model
> ‘memory_order_relaxed’ for ‘bool __atomic_compare_exchange_8(volatile void*,
> void*, long unsigned int, bool, int, int)’ [-Werror=invalid-memory-model]
> 325 | return __atomic_compare_exchange(std::__addressof(_M_i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 326 | std::__addressof(__e),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 327 | std::__addressof(__i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 328 | true, int(__s), int(__f));
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: note: valid models are
> 'memory_order_relaxed'
> In member function ‘bool std::atomic<_Tp>::compare_exchange_weak(_Tp&, _Tp,
> std::memory_order, std::memory_order) [with _Tp =
> xenium::marked_ptr<xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_control_block, 18>]’,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::mark_next(marked_ptr,
> size_t)’ at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:563:46,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_or_skip_marked_block(marked_ptr&,
> marked_ptr&, marked_ptr, xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::stamp_t)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:485:24,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_from_prev_list(marked_ptr&,
> marked_ptr, marked_ptr&)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:361:40,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove(marked_ptr)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:155:49,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_data::leave_region()’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:620:36:
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: error: failure memory model
> ‘memory_order_acquire’ cannot be stronger than success memory model
> ‘memory_order_relaxed’ for ‘bool __atomic_compare_exchange_8(volatile void*,
> void*, long unsigned int, bool, int, int)’ [-Werror=invalid-memory-model]
> 325 | return __atomic_compare_exchange(std::__addressof(_M_i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 326 | std::__addressof(__e),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 327 | std::__addressof(__i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 328 | true, int(__s), int(__f));
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: note: valid models are
> 'memory_order_relaxed'
> In member function ‘bool std::atomic<_Tp>::compare_exchange_weak(_Tp&, _Tp,
> std::memory_order, std::memory_order) [with _Tp =
> xenium::marked_ptr<xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_control_block, 18>]’,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::mark_next(marked_ptr,
> size_t)’ at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:563:46,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_or_skip_marked_block(marked_ptr&,
> marked_ptr&, marked_ptr, xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::stamp_t)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:485:24,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_from_next_list(marked_ptr,
> marked_ptr, marked_ptr)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:448:40,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove(marked_ptr)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:157:30,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_data::leave_region()’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:620:36:
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: error: failure memory model
> ‘memory_order_acquire’ cannot be stronger than success memory model
> ‘memory_order_relaxed’ for ‘bool __atomic_compare_exchange_8(volatile void*,
> void*, long unsigned int, bool, int, int)’ [-Werror=invalid-memory-model]
> 325 | return __atomic_compare_exchange(std::__addressof(_M_i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 326 | std::__addressof(__e),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 327 | std::__addressof(__i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 328 | true, int(__s), int(__f));
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: note: valid models are
> 'memory_order_relaxed'
> In member function ‘bool std::atomic<_Tp>::compare_exchange_weak(_Tp&, _Tp,
> std::memory_order, std::memory_order) [with _Tp =
> xenium::marked_ptr<xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_control_block, 18>]’,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::mark_next(marked_ptr,
> size_t)’ at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:563:46,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_from_prev_list(marked_ptr&,
> marked_ptr, marked_ptr&)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:307:25,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove(marked_ptr)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:155:49,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_data::leave_region()’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:620:36:
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: error: failure memory model
> ‘memory_order_acquire’ cannot be stronger than success memory model
> ‘memory_order_relaxed’ for ‘bool __atomic_compare_exchange_8(volatile void*,
> void*, long unsigned int, bool, int, int)’ [-Werror=invalid-memory-model]
> 325 | return __atomic_compare_exchange(std::__addressof(_M_i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 326 | std::__addressof(__e),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 327 | std::__addressof(__i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 328 | true, int(__s), int(__f));
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: note: valid models are
> 'memory_order_relaxed'
> In member function ‘bool std::atomic<_Tp>::compare_exchange_weak(_Tp&, _Tp,
> std::memory_order, std::memory_order) [with _Tp =
> xenium::marked_ptr<xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_control_block, 18>]’,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::mark_next(marked_ptr,
> size_t)’ at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:563:46,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_or_skip_marked_block(marked_ptr&,
> marked_ptr&, marked_ptr, xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::stamp_t)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:485:24,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_from_prev_list(marked_ptr&,
> marked_ptr, marked_ptr&)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:361:40,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove(marked_ptr)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:155:49,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_data::leave_region()’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:620:36:
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: error: failure memory model
> ‘memory_order_acquire’ cannot be stronger than success memory model
> ‘memory_order_relaxed’ for ‘bool __atomic_compare_exchange_8(volatile void*,
> void*, long unsigned int, bool, int, int)’ [-Werror=invalid-memory-model]
> 325 | return __atomic_compare_exchange(std::__addressof(_M_i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 326 | std::__addressof(__e),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 327 | std::__addressof(__i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 328 | true, int(__s), int(__f));
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: note: valid models are
> 'memory_order_relaxed'
> In member function ‘bool std::atomic<_Tp>::compare_exchange_weak(_Tp&, _Tp,
> std::memory_order, std::memory_order) [with _Tp =
> xenium::marked_ptr<xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_control_block, 18>]’,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::mark_next(marked_ptr,
> size_t)’ at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:563:46,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_or_skip_marked_block(marked_ptr&,
> marked_ptr&, marked_ptr, xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::stamp_t)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:485:24,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_from_next_list(marked_ptr,
> marked_ptr, marked_ptr)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:448:40,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove(marked_ptr)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:157:30,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_data::leave_region()’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:620:36:
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: error: failure memory model
> ‘memory_order_acquire’ cannot be stronger than success memory model
> ‘memory_order_relaxed’ for ‘bool __atomic_compare_exchange_8(volatile void*,
> void*, long unsigned int, bool, int, int)’ [-Werror=invalid-memory-model]
> 325 | return __atomic_compare_exchange(std::__addressof(_M_i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 326 | std::__addressof(__e),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 327 | std::__addressof(__i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 328 | true, int(__s), int(__f));
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: note: valid models are
> 'memory_order_relaxed'
> [ 70%] Building CXX object
> CMakeFiles/gtest.dir/test/reclamation/hazard_eras_test.cpp.o
> /usr/bin/c++ -DDEBUG -I/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/. -isystem
> /usr/src/googletest/googletest -isystem
> /usr/src/googletest/googletest/include -g -O2
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
> -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fsanitize=thread
> -Wall -Wextra -Werror -Wno-error=cpp -std=gnu++17 -MD -MT
> CMakeFiles/gtest.dir/test/reclamation/hazard_eras_test.cpp.o -MF
> CMakeFiles/gtest.dir/test/reclamation/hazard_eras_test.cpp.o.d -o
> CMakeFiles/gtest.dir/test/reclamation/hazard_eras_test.cpp.o -c
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/reclamation/hazard_eras_test.cpp
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:41,
> from
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/detail/concurrent_ptr.hpp:11,
> from
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/lock_free_ref_count.hpp:9,
> from /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/michael_scott_queue_test.cpp:1:
> In function ‘void std::atomic_thread_fence(memory_order)’,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::quiescent_state_based::thread_data::try_update_epoch(unsigned
> int, unsigned int)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/quiescent_state_based.hpp:129:33:
> /usr/include/c++/12/bits/atomic_base.h:133:26: error: ‘atomic_thread_fence’
> is not supported with ‘-fsanitize=thread’ [-Werror=tsan]
> 133 | { __atomic_thread_fence(int(__m)); }
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:41,
> from
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/detail/concurrent_ptr.hpp:11,
> from
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/generic_epoch_based.hpp:9,
> from
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/reclamation/generic_epoch_based_test.cpp:1:
> In function ‘void std::atomic_thread_fence(memory_order)’,
> inlined from ‘xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::epoch_t
> xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::thread_data::update_global_epoch(xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::epoch_t,
> xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::epoch_t) [with Traits =
> xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based_traits<0,
> xenium::reclamation::scan::all_threads, xenium::reclamation::abandon::never,
> xenium::reclamation::region_extension::eager>]’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/generic_epoch_based.hpp:417:33,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::thread_data::do_enter_critical()
> [with Traits = xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based_traits<0,
> xenium::reclamation::scan::all_threads, xenium::reclamation::abandon::never,
> xenium::reclamation::region_extension::eager>]’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/generic_epoch_based.hpp:378:38:
> /usr/include/c++/12/bits/atomic_base.h:133:26: error: ‘atomic_thread_fence’
> is not supported with ‘-fsanitize=thread’ [-Werror=tsan]
> 133 | { __atomic_thread_fence(int(__m)); }
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
> In member function ‘bool std::atomic<_Tp>::compare_exchange_weak(_Tp&, _Tp,
> std::memory_order, std::memory_order) [with _Tp =
> xenium::marked_ptr<xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_control_block, 18>]’,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::mark_next(marked_ptr,
> size_t)’ at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:563:46,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_from_prev_list(marked_ptr&,
> marked_ptr, marked_ptr&)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:307:25,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove(marked_ptr)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:155:49,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_data::leave_region()’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:620:36:
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: error: failure memory model
> ‘memory_order_acquire’ cannot be stronger than success memory model
> ‘memory_order_relaxed’ for ‘bool __atomic_compare_exchange_8(volatile void*,
> void*, long unsigned int, bool, int, int)’ [-Werror=invalid-memory-model]
> 325 | return __atomic_compare_exchange(std::__addressof(_M_i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 326 | std::__addressof(__e),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 327 | std::__addressof(__i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 328 | true, int(__s), int(__f));
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: note: valid models are
> 'memory_order_relaxed'
> In member function ‘bool std::atomic<_Tp>::compare_exchange_weak(_Tp&, _Tp,
> std::memory_order, std::memory_order) [with _Tp =
> xenium::marked_ptr<xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_control_block, 18>]’,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::mark_next(marked_ptr,
> size_t)’ at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:563:46,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_or_skip_marked_block(marked_ptr&,
> marked_ptr&, marked_ptr, xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::stamp_t)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:485:24,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_from_prev_list(marked_ptr&,
> marked_ptr, marked_ptr&)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:361:40,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove(marked_ptr)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:155:49,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_data::leave_region()’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:620:36:
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: error: failure memory model
> ‘memory_order_acquire’ cannot be stronger than success memory model
> ‘memory_order_relaxed’ for ‘bool __atomic_compare_exchange_8(volatile void*,
> void*, long unsigned int, bool, int, int)’ [-Werror=invalid-memory-model]
> 325 | return __atomic_compare_exchange(std::__addressof(_M_i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 326 | std::__addressof(__e),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 327 | std::__addressof(__i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 328 | true, int(__s), int(__f));
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: note: valid models are
> 'memory_order_relaxed'
> In member function ‘bool std::atomic<_Tp>::compare_exchange_weak(_Tp&, _Tp,
> std::memory_order, std::memory_order) [with _Tp =
> xenium::marked_ptr<xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_control_block, 18>]’,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::mark_next(marked_ptr,
> size_t)’ at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:563:46,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_or_skip_marked_block(marked_ptr&,
> marked_ptr&, marked_ptr, xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::stamp_t)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:485:24,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove_from_next_list(marked_ptr,
> marked_ptr, marked_ptr)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:448:40,
> inlined from ‘bool
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_order_queue::remove(marked_ptr)’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:157:30,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::stamp_it::thread_data::leave_region()’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/stamp_it.hpp:620:36:
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: error: failure memory model
> ‘memory_order_acquire’ cannot be stronger than success memory model
> ‘memory_order_relaxed’ for ‘bool __atomic_compare_exchange_8(volatile void*,
> void*, long unsigned int, bool, int, int)’ [-Werror=invalid-memory-model]
> 325 | return __atomic_compare_exchange(std::__addressof(_M_i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 326 | std::__addressof(__e),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 327 | std::__addressof(__i),
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 328 | true, int(__s), int(__f));
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /usr/include/c++/12/atomic:325:41: note: valid models are
> 'memory_order_relaxed'
> In function ‘void std::atomic_thread_fence(memory_order)’,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::thread_data::set_critical_region_flag()
> [with Traits = xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based_traits<0,
> xenium::reclamation::scan::all_threads, xenium::reclamation::abandon::never,
> xenium::reclamation::region_extension::eager>]’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/generic_epoch_based.hpp:337:31,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::thread_data::enter_region()
> [with Traits = xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based_traits<0,
> xenium::reclamation::scan::all_threads, xenium::reclamation::abandon::never,
> xenium::reclamation::region_extension::eager>]’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/generic_epoch_based.hpp:287:35,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::thread_data::enter_critical()
> [with Traits = xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based_traits<0,
> xenium::reclamation::scan::all_threads, xenium::reclamation::abandon::never,
> xenium::reclamation::region_extension::eager>]’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/generic_epoch_based.hpp:301:19,
> inlined from
> ‘xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::guard_ptr<T,
> MarkedPtr>::guard_ptr(const MarkedPtr&) [with T = {anonymous}::Foo; MarkedPtr
> = xenium::marked_ptr<{anonymous}::Foo, 2, 16>; Traits =
> xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based_traits<0,
> xenium::reclamation::scan::all_threads, xenium::reclamation::abandon::never,
> xenium::reclamation::region_extension::eager>]’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/generic_epoch_based.hpp:141:39:
> /usr/include/c++/12/bits/atomic_base.h:133:26: error: ‘atomic_thread_fence’
> is not supported with ‘-fsanitize=thread’ [-Werror=tsan]
> 133 | { __atomic_thread_fence(int(__m)); }
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
> In function ‘void std::atomic_thread_fence(memory_order)’,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::thread_data::set_critical_region_flag()
> [with Traits = xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based_traits<0,
> xenium::reclamation::scan::all_threads, xenium::reclamation::abandon::never,
> xenium::reclamation::region_extension::eager>]’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/generic_epoch_based.hpp:337:31,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::thread_data::enter_region()
> [with Traits = xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based_traits<0,
> xenium::reclamation::scan::all_threads, xenium::reclamation::abandon::never,
> xenium::reclamation::region_extension::eager>]’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/generic_epoch_based.hpp:287:35,
> inlined from ‘void
> xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::thread_data::enter_critical()
> [with Traits = xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based_traits<0,
> xenium::reclamation::scan::all_threads, xenium::reclamation::abandon::never,
> xenium::reclamation::region_extension::eager>]’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/generic_epoch_based.hpp:301:19,
> inlined from
> ‘xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::guard_ptr<T, MarkedPtr>&
> xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::guard_ptr<T,
> MarkedPtr>::operator=(const
> xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based<Traits>::guard_ptr<T, MarkedPtr>&)
> [with T = {anonymous}::Foo; MarkedPtr = xenium::marked_ptr<{anonymous}::Foo,
> 2, 16>; Traits = xenium::reclamation::generic_epoch_based_traits<0,
> xenium::reclamation::scan::all_threads, xenium::reclamation::abandon::never,
> xenium::reclamation::region_extension::eager>]’ at
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/./xenium/reclamation/impl/generic_epoch_based.hpp:169:39,
> inlined from ‘virtual void
> {anonymous}::GenericEpochBased_copy_assignment_leads_to_shared_ownership_preventing_the_object_from_beeing_reclaimed_Test::TestBody()’
> at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/reclamation/generic_epoch_based_test.cpp:139:9:
> /usr/include/c++/12/bits/atomic_base.h:133:26: error: ‘atomic_thread_fence’
> is not supported with ‘-fsanitize=thread’ [-Werror=tsan]
> 133 | { __atomic_thread_fence(int(__m)); }
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
> cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[4]: *** [CMakeFiles/gtest.dir/build.make:247:
> CMakeFiles/gtest.dir/test/reclamation/generic_epoch_based_test.cpp.o] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/07/28/xenium_0.0.2+ds-6_unstable.log
All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220728;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20220728&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
