Your message dated Sun, 21 Aug 2022 14:36:31 +0000
with message-id <e1opm3z-00dgss...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1005427: fixed in ruby-rack-test 2.0.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005427,
regarding ruby-rack-test: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: Failure/Error: 
expect(body).to receive(:close)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1005427: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005427
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-rack-test
Version: 0.7.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
>      Failure/Error: expect(body).to receive(:close)
> 
>        (#<CloseableBody:0x000055922c37f578 @closed=false>).close(*(any args))
>            expected: 1 time with any arguments
>            received: 2 times with any arguments
>      # ./spec/rack/test_spec.rb:168:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
> 
> Deprecation Warnings:
> 
> Using `should` from rspec-expectations' old `:should` syntax without 
> explicitly enabling the syntax is deprecated. Use the new `:expect` syntax or 
> explicitly enable `:should` with `config.expect_with(:rspec) { |c| c.syntax = 
> :should }` instead. Called from 
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/spec/rack/test/cookie_spec.rb:49:in `block (3 levels) in 
> <top (required)>'.
> 
> 
> If you need more of the backtrace for any of these deprecations to
> identify where to make the necessary changes, you can configure
> `config.raise_errors_for_deprecations!`, and it will turn the
> deprecation warnings into errors, giving you the full backtrace.
> 
> 1 deprecation warning total
> 
> Finished in 0.17521 seconds (files took 0.627 seconds to load)
> 204 examples, 1 failure, 2 pending
> 
> Failed examples:
> 
> rspec ./spec/rack/test_spec.rb:166 # Rack::Test::Session#request when the 
> response body responds_to?(:close) closes response's body
> 
> /usr/bin/ruby2.7 
> -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.10.3/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.10.1/lib
>  /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.10.1/exe/rspec 
> --pattern ./\*\*/\*_spec.rb failed
> ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: 


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/02/12/ruby-rack-test_0.7.0-2_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-rack-test
Source-Version: 2.0.2-1
Done: Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby-rack-test, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1005...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> (supplier of updated ruby-rack-test 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 11:12:15 -0300
Source: ruby-rack-test
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team 
<pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
Closes: 1005427
Changes:
 ruby-rack-test (2.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   * debian/watch: point at github to get tests
   * New upstream version 2.0.2
     - Upstream changed the test suite from rspec to minitest, so the reported
       build failure no longer applies (Closes: #1005427)
   * debian/upstream/metadata: update with dh-make-ruby
   * debian/rules: stop setting DH_RUBY_GEMSPEC, no longer needed
   * debian/control: update with dh-make-ruby
     - Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.1; no changes needed
     - Drop alternative build dependency on ruby-rack1.4 (it no longer exists)
     - Update homepage to point to the new upstream homepage
     - Add Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-ruby
     - Add Rules-Requires-Root: no
     - Replace hardcoded dependencies with ${ruby:Depends
     - Update binary package description from upstream metadata
   * Add build dependency on ruby-minitest-global-expectations
   * debian/ruby-tests.rake: symlink to upstream Rakefile.
     Upstream switched from rspec to minitest, so using rspec no longer
     works.
   * Drop patches, no longer needed in new upstream release
   * Add patch to make test suite work against installed package
Checksums-Sha1:
 cb12b9d6a47e575f5fa8cf2a9737eb0ff1f03061 2141 ruby-rack-test_2.0.2-1.dsc
 ecb0b7edf4fba24ef1e20b31611bc6b592ca2045 30651 ruby-rack-test_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz
 7cf530d5c4b1d2c773bc166212768c083e1ed72f 4388 
ruby-rack-test_2.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 d7fc9a11a4746387164077a671b6a640b001483d 10377 
ruby-rack-test_2.0.2-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 2f6f51ec877c5e831ba606d413c853d094cb8615820304da7fc8b739156e7e14 2141 
ruby-rack-test_2.0.2-1.dsc
 619bd3f633232abbc5fc03952463ce520fcf6281f092fdcf34151341fcb2c939 30651 
ruby-rack-test_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz
 bc6281c5f4babc2190a3cb947212d5ca84cd2f594c98bf418e3cb896e058ec00 4388 
ruby-rack-test_2.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 4066eb9d19c6ce9a0512bba9eb8a43a3ee4c631970af86937dd632e7e1aebaa1 10377 
ruby-rack-test_2.0.2-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 b224df5b42b8ce8e84f4228111d57bf5 2141 ruby optional ruby-rack-test_2.0.2-1.dsc
 e38f14a0a71378c99b02f41aaf856cf4 30651 ruby optional 
ruby-rack-test_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz
 f61c304eac65505545156f2f62886263 4388 ruby optional 
ruby-rack-test_2.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 1d5bb30608b0f70a468f627835540d4b 10377 ruby optional 
ruby-rack-test_2.0.2-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEst7mYDbECCn80PEM/A2xu81GC94FAmMCPkcACgkQ/A2xu81G
C9604g//Q2/or9X+15kRIFWWAA9C83yXU+dHdaDgzVN1cb7nxK4MrmAudA7Vqxk/
uYL4dGdGYjloBl+AhoGv0gpHBd1dwKlxdsDYzBOmFmlap2DtyWf+f4toK2pcAfsz
1qfOwr75hBtPYn9MV1aCI627HhhB7GV4tUhbhouNad8Xc7RHg268rzXQiynbl+1g
IsGJZW73bM4iPLXMGulm1xpOMHvxd6LZ8BofcC/7IkolsFWnzmDgT9K9pvFto1Dg
+IRIxp2/O5CvmCZuBU8kattyJmftb0DYrD8NkZV4fHrHeNsWpTkNL9j42kPjNOKn
5dajt1ynuIZ6Io798G92EepUcZfptc1BNJMAig7MGj7ltYrVVewarpEf3j/OYutq
N2Mrv8TxuJ/WgRs5e3sg82SaB2KZNAHyhynDWjlpCzI+PirgVXk1/2d5YLi5bdGT
ARUg8uAEopljOecvVwPHCmkX84ysWyMrMWZyRgrGoAR+Bp3NfzTRa4GYuAFIZd/X
8/SKhwT8YwuI+WgxCD0z0UOKzJqeMufuOgAaUSmrmu8+PDILgrf4QZ3FVEl7Zf+m
HCHsP7bYCZhYu1iEpUEQOKsyTw7x/mVwizm69UvABmRDtyzyUAzTm7feq1SlXllC
LJ22ZhPTTIUmYnI/6bHqfZBUJhGQSqgZX/FyLg47Qs9v6URdxwo=
=aC3b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to