Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2022 01:33:46 +0000
with message-id <e1nbuym-0008pm...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#999180: fixed in ldap2dns 0.3.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #999180,
regarding ldap2dns: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or 
build-indep
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
999180: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999180
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ldap2dns
Version: 0.3.1-3.2
Severity: important
Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
Tags: bookworm sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep

Dear maintainer,

Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be
affected by this issue.

This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html .
The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month.

Best,

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ldap2dns
Source-Version: 0.3.1-4
Done: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eribe...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ldap2dns, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 999...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eribe...@debian.org> (supplier of updated ldap2dns 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 22:03:41 -0300
Source: ldap2dns
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eribe...@debian.org>
Closes: 999180
Changes:
 ldap2dns (0.3.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Set Debian QA Group as maintainer. (See #843591)
   * debian/rules: added missing targets build-arch and build-indep.
     (Closes: #999180)
Checksums-Sha1:
 99d519e126fd9f397a5e9866e616c72c2a13f985 1688 ldap2dns_0.3.1-4.dsc
 d355adb92b68a76f71f1efa5cdb780ab3f1a24ba 6741 ldap2dns_0.3.1-4.diff.gz
 6da21637cea58d8ad9ed219a6132bb5c0cb73a1b 6078 ldap2dns_0.3.1-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 45d949e180249286b82eac37b7326f5bd94a90027d8779140d42f60493575922 1688 
ldap2dns_0.3.1-4.dsc
 be82c28834871f4499039bd003d3c0ed3f60a844721fe9021bf2897044f12863 6741 
ldap2dns_0.3.1-4.diff.gz
 de6ec53f68532f323b5eda279cfeb5c82b419dc7040f99b541a8c827f5946dc6 6078 
ldap2dns_0.3.1-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
 08c254fae7e9974928128fb54a6fd6bb 1688 admin optional ldap2dns_0.3.1-4.dsc
 0ac228028933da5f803a3a1a6311deb6 6741 admin optional ldap2dns_0.3.1-4.diff.gz
 e9f5a60a4685fd63ecd9ada284360efe 6078 admin optional 
ldap2dns_0.3.1-4_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=hvt6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to