Your message dated Mon, 03 Jan 2022 09:34:12 +0000
with message-id <e1n4jji-0004qj...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#999214: fixed in gkrellm-reminder 2.0.0-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #999214,
regarding gkrellm-reminder: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch 
and/or build-indep
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
999214: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999214
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gkrellm-reminder
Version: 2.0.0-3
Severity: important
Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
Tags: bookworm sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep

Dear maintainer,

Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be
affected by this issue.

This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html .
The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month.

Best,

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gkrellm-reminder
Source-Version: 2.0.0-3.1
Done: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gkrellm-reminder, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 999...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> (supplier of updated gkrellm-reminder package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 01:18:23 +0200
Source: gkrellm-reminder
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.0-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joerg Jaspert <jo...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Closes: 965551 999214
Changes:
 gkrellm-reminder (2.0.0-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/compat: 5 -> 7. (Closes: #965551)
   * debian/rules: Add build-{arch,indep}. (Closes: #999214)
Checksums-Sha1:
 8cc3bc09d9ae59dd01b0ba0b9c8460e8f61c4aa0 1778 gkrellm-reminder_2.0.0-3.1.dsc
 65355827223fcfa4e0c3c1dfdadc8dc5ed0358da 2612 
gkrellm-reminder_2.0.0-3.1.diff.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 ca9f23514c098e4a0f239e82891613a43ed7708741cab50d17e800785bf8fc2e 1778 
gkrellm-reminder_2.0.0-3.1.dsc
 77a1549538f91f689fc46fd4cbe65782b1087a0b5e2a3bedde9cafefe06c39ed 2612 
gkrellm-reminder_2.0.0-3.1.diff.gz
Files:
 2602a64c9d54d5bf2e515cf63c07ed09 1778 x11 optional 
gkrellm-reminder_2.0.0-3.1.dsc
 aa157a2321b0a01c5ad5389bedc18c2e 2612 x11 optional 
gkrellm-reminder_2.0.0-3.1.diff.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=wjvG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to