Your message dated Mon, 03 Jan 2022 09:34:57 +0000
with message-id <e1n4jk1-0004y7...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#999008: fixed in jtex-base 2.1-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #999008,
regarding jtex-base: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or 
build-indep
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
999008: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999008
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jtex-base
Version: 2.1-1.2
Severity: important
Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
Tags: bookworm sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep

Dear maintainer,

Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be
affected by this issue.

This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html .
The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month.

Best,

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jtex-base
Source-Version: 2.1-1.3
Done: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jtex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 999...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> (supplier of updated jtex-base package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 22:41:30 +0200
Source: jtex-base
Architecture: source
Version: 2.1-1.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <tsuch...@namazu.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Closes: 773956 999008
Changes:
 jtex-base (2.1-1.3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/rules: Add build-{arch,indep}. (Closes: #999008)
   * Remove Atsuhito Kohda from Uploaders. (Closes: #773956)
Checksums-Sha1:
 3bbcaae33260d02f419c5ac9b668f0958dba4237 1711 jtex-base_2.1-1.3.dsc
 59c22a83c67f7c62b73f10b72e41b39739a47cff 7723 jtex-base_2.1-1.3.diff.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 10ef1c78f9d39501735930ba00e242760be7701c1bfe9daf8ff841cf8e870726 1711 
jtex-base_2.1-1.3.dsc
 bf4cfa197aeea9c8822ece2d0b755cf569bc6137a4808febab7758acc3344560 7723 
jtex-base_2.1-1.3.diff.gz
Files:
 4fac55cf5a36016d3e4d7bd74ee8a2dd 1711 tex optional jtex-base_2.1-1.3.dsc
 2afcbbcbcd767163274dac5c0a531a41 7723 tex optional jtex-base_2.1-1.3.diff.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=c8uN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to