Your message dated Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:38:44 +0000
with message-id <e1mqftc-000ijp...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#999650: fixed in ruby-oily-png 1.2.1~dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #999650,
regarding ruby-oily-png FTBFS on 32bit
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
999650: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999650
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-oily-png
Version: 1.2.1~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ruby-oily-png

...
Failures:

  1) OilyPNG::Color#compose_quick should use the background color as is when a 
fully transparent pixel is given as foreground color
     Failure/Error: expect(compose_quick(@fully_transparent, @white)).to 
be(@white)

       expected #<Integer:820> => 4294967295
            got #<Integer:830> => 4294967295

       Compared using equal?, which compares object identity,
       but expected and actual are not the same object. Use
       `expect(actual).to eq(expected)` if you don't care about
       object identity in this example.
     # ./spec/color_spec.rb:24:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'

  2) OilyPNG::Color#compose_quick should compose pixels correctly
     Failure/Error: expect(compose_quick(@non_opaque, @white)).to be(0x9fc2d6ff)

       expected #<Integer:840> => 2680346367
            got #<Integer:850> => 2680346367

       Compared using equal?, which compares object identity,
       but expected and actual are not the same object. Use
       `expect(actual).to eq(expected)` if you don't care about
       object identity in this example.
     # ./spec/color_spec.rb:28:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'

  3) OilyPNG::Color#compose_quick should compose colors exactly the same as 
ChunkyPNG
     Failure/Error: expect(compose_quick(fg, bg)).to 
be(ChunkyPNG::Color.compose_quick(fg, bg))

       expected #<Integer:860> => 2126858483
            got #<Integer:870> => 2126858483

       Compared using equal?, which compares object identity,
       but expected and actual are not the same object. Use
       `expect(actual).to eq(expected)` if you don't care about
       object identity in this example.
     # ./spec/color_spec.rb:33:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'

Finished in 0.36245 seconds (files took 0.22531 seconds to load)
146 examples, 3 failures, 18 pending

Failed examples:

rspec ./spec/color_spec.rb:23 # OilyPNG::Color#compose_quick should use the 
background color as is when a fully transparent pixel is given as foreground 
color
rspec ./spec/color_spec.rb:27 # OilyPNG::Color#compose_quick should compose 
pixels correctly
rspec ./spec/color_spec.rb:31 # OilyPNG::Color#compose_quick should compose 
colors exactly the same as ChunkyPNG

/usr/bin/ruby2.7 
-I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.9.3/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.9.2/lib
 /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.9.2/exe/rspec --pattern 
./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb --format documentation failed
ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed. Exiting.
dh_auto_install: error: dh_ruby --install 
/<<BUILDDIR>>/ruby-oily-png-1.2.1\~dfsg/debian/ruby-oily-png returned exit code 
1
make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary-arch] Error 25

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-oily-png
Source-Version: 1.2.1~dfsg-3
Done: Lucas Kanashiro <kanash...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby-oily-png, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 999...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Lucas Kanashiro <kanash...@debian.org> (supplier of updated ruby-oily-png 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:53:31 -0300
Source: ruby-oily-png
Architecture: source
Version: 1.2.1~dfsg-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team 
<pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Lucas Kanashiro <kanash...@debian.org>
Closes: 999650
Changes:
 ruby-oily-png (1.2.1~dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Add patch to fix tests failing on 32 bits architectures (Closes: #999650)
Checksums-Sha1:
 490f004ad592cf2431c93a60a68b153561b56a7d 2136 ruby-oily-png_1.2.1~dfsg-3.dsc
 c9197b7d2174f16d10efc61cbdd3beec90890294 6680 
ruby-oily-png_1.2.1~dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 c2c8b58ff0fe0249bff226bcf126b919202c6a36970da09a5558979e0a230ae0 2136 
ruby-oily-png_1.2.1~dfsg-3.dsc
 62165397228b334e41dd52cfb2ca2c5d7e9592eda8ff0d90d29fbe539f3ecac4 6680 
ruby-oily-png_1.2.1~dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 0a7b3575b7c280670d1c3d159320ff14 2136 ruby optional 
ruby-oily-png_1.2.1~dfsg-3.dsc
 7926a5b5a5d651cd561a98acdf1be6d4 6680 ruby optional 
ruby-oily-png_1.2.1~dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=z/fZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to