Hi Paul, > With a recent upload of pktanon the autopkgtest of pktanon fails in > testing on armhf when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages > of pktanon from unstable. [...] > Currently this regression is blocking the migration to testing [1]. Can > you please investigate the situation and fix it?
I am puzzled. The recent upload only changed the watchfile and updated Standards-Version, compat level etc -- packaging things. Nothing touched the code or build rules. Also, I can't reproduce the bus error when running the offending command from the autopkgtest on a version I built on a porterbox: (sid_armhf-dchroot)satta@abel:~/pktanon-2~git20160407.0.2bde4f2+dfsg$ ../usr/bin/pktanon -c ../usr/share/doc/pktanon/examples/profiles/profile.xml profiles/sample.pcap ./out.pcap ----------------------------------------------- pktanon --- profile-based traffic anonymization ----------------------------------------------- initializing PktAnon, configuration = ../usr/share/doc/pktanon/examples/profiles/profile.xml unknown element: pktanon-config: 37 unknown element: anonymizations: 102 istream: opened file profiles/sample.pcap ostream: opened output file ./out.pcap initialized complete statistics for input file 'profiles/sample.pcap' processed packets: 9 errors in packets: 0 elapsed time: 639us Mpps: 0.0141 I must admit that being unfamiliar with these architectures and not really having an idea of where to start, I am tempted to just remove armhf from the list of supported architectures and have the version with the broken autopkgtest removed from unstable. Do you probably know someone who might be more knowledgeable with such architecture-specific issues? Cheers Sascha
