Your message dated Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:34:20 +0000
with message-id <e1mlkwk-0006dl...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#998480: fixed in ruby-fog-aws 3.12.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #998480,
regarding FTBFS: ERROR: Test ruby3.0 failed: 
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:85:in `require': 
cannot load such file -- nokogiri (LoadError)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998480: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998480
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-fog-aws
Version: 3.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:85:in 
> `require': cannot load such file -- nokogiri (LoadError)
>       from 
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:85:in `require'
>       from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/xml.rb:2:in `<top (required)>'
>       from 
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:85:in `require'
>       from 
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:85:in `require'
>       from /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/lib/fog/aws.rb:2:in `<top (required)>'
>       from 
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:85:in `require'
>       from 
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:85:in `require'
>       from /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/lib/fog-aws.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'
>       from 
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:85:in `require'
>       from 
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:85:in `require'
>       from /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/tests/helper.rb:9:in `<top (required)>'
>       from 
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/shindo-0.3.10/lib/shindo/bin.rb:55:in
>  `load'
>       from 
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/shindo-0.3.10/lib/shindo/bin.rb:55:in
>  `block (2 levels) in run_in_thread'
>       from 
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/shindo-0.3.10/lib/shindo/bin.rb:53:in
>  `each'
>       from 
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/shindo-0.3.10/lib/shindo/bin.rb:53:in
>  `block in run_in_thread'
> Coverage report generated for Shindo to /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/coverage. 3 / 160 
> LOC (1.88%) covered.
> rake aborted!
> Command failed with status (1): [export FOG_MOCK=true && shindont...]
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/ruby-tests.rake:9:in `block in <top (required)>'
> Tasks: TOP => default => test
> (See full trace by running task with --trace)
> ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: 


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/11/04/ruby-fog-aws_3.12.0-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-fog-aws
Source-Version: 3.12.0-2
Done: Daniel Leidert <dleid...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby-fog-aws, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 998...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Leidert <dleid...@debian.org> (supplier of updated ruby-fog-aws package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:27:53 +0100
Source: ruby-fog-aws
Architecture: source
Version: 3.12.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team 
<pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Daniel Leidert <dleid...@debian.org>
Closes: 998480
Changes:
 ruby-fog-aws (3.12.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * d/control (Depends): Remove interpreters and use ${ruby:Depends}.
   * d/ruby-tests.rake: Execute shindont with the correct Ruby binary
     (closes: #998480).
   * d/source/include-binaries: Remove unused file.
Checksums-Sha1:
 204c6144520a48135467872194d6696e11b5ffab 2262 ruby-fog-aws_3.12.0-2.dsc
 733ab010ae8a802f4cb767cb0599c44ea4b8df90 5144 
ruby-fog-aws_3.12.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 dd5068a28f9abe22c6746ff9a8b8bffd8bd0db8f 10014 
ruby-fog-aws_3.12.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 0d9fbcfc0d1c1643347307c27a76ab3eac69fa61fd6c4e6c9e7f1753d277276e 2262 
ruby-fog-aws_3.12.0-2.dsc
 ab5d0f149259a905f0f4936c894699d14a66c7898a2c3316ffac10bdfd08e332 5144 
ruby-fog-aws_3.12.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 4786d033d7d6a6db7c4eb6af1f7c141d90eb2abf7d51a1d2ae58c23f9aa66fb8 10014 
ruby-fog-aws_3.12.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 99df58bdf9c79f6b70cd8eea72e208c4 2262 ruby optional ruby-fog-aws_3.12.0-2.dsc
 f52cba83e6d9fa8dfa65311a4f118575 5144 ruby optional 
ruby-fog-aws_3.12.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 7ffdcf69018f03cd6647b9e649dffd59 10014 ruby optional 
ruby-fog-aws_3.12.0-2_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=YP43
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to