The line causing the error message can safely be removed as it is redundant. The correction appears in the most recent stable release, 3.2.0
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, 16:24 Lucas Nussbaum, <lu...@debian.org> wrote: > Source: lives > Version: 3.0.2-1.1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. > > > Relevant part (hopefully): > > gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"LiVES\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"lives\" > -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"3.0.2\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"LiVES\ 3.0.2\" > -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"https://github.com/salsaman/LiVES/issues\"; > -DPACKAGE_URL=\"http://lives-video.com\"; -DPACKAGE=\"lives\" > -DVERSION=\"3.0.2\" -DHAVE_STDIO_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 > -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 > -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_WCHAR_H=1 > -DHAVE_SYS_PARAM_H=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -D_ALL_SOURCE=1 -D_DARWIN_C_SOURCE=1 > -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_HPUX_ALT_XOPEN_SOCKET_API=1 -D_NETBSD_SOURCE=1 > -D_OPENBSD_SOURCE=1 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS=1 > -D__STDC_WANT_IEC_60559_ATTRIBS_EXT__=1 -D__STDC_WANT_IEC_60559_BFP_EXT__=1 > -D__STDC_WANT_IEC_60559_DFP_EXT__=1 -D__STDC_WANT_IEC_60559_FUNCS_EXT__=1 > -D__STDC_WANT_IEC_60559_TYPES_EXT__=1 -D__STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT2__=1 > -D__STDC_WANT_MATH_SPEC_FUNCS__=1 -D_TANDEM_SOURCE=1 -D__EXTENSIONS__=1 > -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -DLT_OBJDIR=\".libs/\" -DHAVE_PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT=1 > -DHAVE_PTHREAD=1 -DGETTEXT_PACKAGE=\"lives\" > -DLOCALEDIR=\"\$\{datarootdir\}/locale\" -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" > -DLiVES_VERSION=\"3.0.2\" -DHAVE_VISIBILITY=1 > -DHAVE_STDINT_H_WITH_UINTMAX=1 -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H=1 -DHAVE_ALLOCA=1 > -DHAVE_GETPAGESIZE=1 -DHAVE_MMAP=1 -DINTDIV0_RAISES_SIGFPE=1 > -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H_WITH_UINTMAX=1 -DHAVE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT=1 > -DHAVE_UINTMAX_T=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DUSE_POSIX_THREADS=1 > -DUSE_POSIX_THREADS_WEAK=1 -DHAVE_PTHREAD_RWLOCK=1 > -DHAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE=1 -DHAVE_BUILTIN_EXPECT=1 -DHAVE_ARGZ_H=1 > -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 > -DHAVE_SYS_PARAM_H=1 -DHAVE_GETCWD=1 -DHAVE_GETEGID=1 -DHAVE_GETEUID=1 > -DHAVE_GETGID=1 -DHAVE_GETUID=1 -DHAVE_MEMPCPY=1 -DHAVE_MUNMAP=1 > -DHAVE_STPCPY=1 -DHAVE_STRCASECMP=1 -DHAVE_STRDUP=1 -DHAVE_STRTOUL=1 > -DHAVE_TSEARCH=1 -DHAVE_ARGZ_COUNT=1 -DHAVE_ARGZ_STRINGIFY=1 > -DHAVE_ARGZ_NEXT=1 -DHAVE___FSETLOCKING=1 -DHAVE_DECL_FEOF_UNLOCKED=1 > -DHAVE_DECL_FGETS_UNLOCKED=1 -DHAVE_ICONV=1 -DICONV_CONST= > -DHAVE_NL_LOCALE_NAME=1 -DHAVE_LONG_LONG_INT=1 -DHAVE_WCHAR_T=1 > -DHAVE_WINT_T=1 -DHAVE_INTMAX_T=1 -DHAVE_POSIX_PRINTF=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 > -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDDEF_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 > -DHAVE_ASPRINTF=1 -DHAVE_FWPRINTF=1 -DHAVE_PUTENV=1 -DHAVE_SETENV=1 > -DHAVE_SETLOCALE=1 -DHAVE_SNPRINTF=1 -DHAVE_WCSLEN=1 > -DHAVE_DECL__SNPRINTF=0 -DHAVE_DECL__SNWPRINTF=0 > -DHAVE_DECL_GETC_UNLOCKED=1 -DHAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET=1 -DHAVE_LC_MESSAGES=1 > -DENABLE_NLS=1 -DHAVE_GETTEXT=1 -DHAVE_DCGETTEXT=1 -DHAVE_LIBDL=1 > -DHAVE_POSIX_MEMALIGN=1 -DHAVE_POSIX_FADVISE=1 -DHAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE=1 > -DHAVE_SYS_PRCTL_H=1 -DHAVE_LINUX_JOYSTICK_H=1 -DHAVE_JACK_JACK_H=1 > -DHAVE_JACK_TRANSPORT_H=1 -DHAVE_LINUX_VIDEODEV2_H=1 -DHAVE_FREI0R_H=1 > -DHAVE_LIBRAW1394_RAW1394_H=1 -DHAVE_LIBAVC1394_AVC1394_H=1 > -DHAVE_LIBAVC1394_ROM1394_H=1 -I. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I.. > -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong > -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcommon -Wall -c -o sendOSC-sendOSC.o > `test -f 'sendOSC.c' || echo './'`sendOSC.c > > htmsocket.c:41:10: fatal error: rpc/rpc.h: No such file or directory > > 41 | #include <rpc/rpc.h> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > compilation terminated. > > make[3]: *** [Makefile:605: sendOSC-htmsocket.o] Error 1 > > > The full build log is available from: > http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/10/23/lives_3.0.2-1.1_unstable.log > > A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at > http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! > > If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as > 'affects'-ing > this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects > > If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with > mine > so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. > >
