Hello Mattia, thank you for providing more background on this.
On 2021-09-30 Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: [...] > Realistically, package-wise, I think they would good by not placing PNGs > in arch:any packages, that would side-step this issue. And it's the > proper thing to do anyway so why not. If I thought it was the proper thing I would have done it ages ago. ;-) Splitting off tiny arch:any packages is not without cost (inflated number of packages is very expensive) and it was not worth it. Given this specific problem I will probably ignore this cost and do the split-offs since I cannot do a persistant fix on my side in a different way.. cu Andreas
