Hi Felix, Quoting Felix Geyer (2021-09-30 20:56:14) > On 30.09.21 08:40, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 07:15:16 +0200 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues > > <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > >> you set the upstream bug to > >> https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/issues/336 > >> but I don't think that is correct. The failures is not the same for the > >> different architectures. mipsel fails different than arm64. I bisected > >> upstream git on both architectures and found out that the arm64 failure was > >> introduced in aa0f858 and the mipsel failure comes from e976080. > >> > >> I contacted upstream about that here: > >> https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/issues/338 > > > > the problem has no been present in unstable for three weeks. This is > > blocking > > my work. Could we revert the offending commits or at least set a deadline > > up to > > how long we want to wait for upstream to fix this issue? > > > > I'm willing to put work into an NMU in case you don't have the time right > > now. > > I've prepared a revert of the problematic commits in the git repo. > > So far I've tested amd64 build+autopkgtest and mipsel build, no issues yet.
thank you for your quick reply and for working on this! I have built the current git debian/sid branch on abel (armhf porter box) and it builds fine there as well. Thanks! cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
