Control: tag -1 patch Hi Maarten, Hi Andrius,
On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:43:28 +0300 Andrius Merkys <mer...@debian.org> wrote: > I have just noticed that libcifpp1 violates section 8.2 of Debian policy: Thanks Andrius for catching this! > I suggest splitting them off to a separate Architecture: all package, > for example, libcifpp-data. This package would then be responsible for > keeping mmCIF dictionary via cron, and other packages requiring these > dictionaries would then depend on libcifpp-data. I took the liberty to implement the change you suggest, and push to Salsa [1]. Since this is an RC bug which propagates on several packages, and since it would have to go through NEW, for manual review; I thought that time would be of the essence. Normally, my change builds, passes autopkgtest, and passes piuparts, but I am not against a second pair of eyes to make sure things are alright. [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libcifpp (I left the changelog entry unreleased, to leave room for further changes prior upload if you deem needed.) Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <emoll...@emlwks999.eu> : :' : gpg: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
