On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 12:29:25AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Another thought is to fold the ntp-simple and ntp-refclock packages into > ntp-server and handle the choice via alternatives or some other simple > switch.
I actually have no idea why it was splitted in 2 packages. Afaik the only difference is that one has all the clocks build in, and the other doesn't. This results in a difference of the size of the binary, 200K versus 400K, and I guess a difference in memory usage. The later seems to be the actual reason why it was split, and seems to be 450K difference in RAM used. Anyway, I think we should either go for having 1 package providing both, or have ntp-server be a dummy and empty packages just having the depends. Maybe we should move those binaries in ntp-server to the ntp package? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
