Your message dated Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:05:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373971: ncbi-tools6: libx11-dev, libxt-dev, libsm-dev, 
libice-dev and libxext-dev are missing build-deps.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: ncbi-tools6
Version: 6.1.20060507-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

Dear Aaron,

I did not manage to build the ncbi-tools on a sid/etch mixture
without downloading the following extra packages:

libx11-dev, libxt-dev, libsm-dev, libice-dev, libxext-dev

I suppose it has something to do with the xlibs transition...

http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

Also, I had to chmod 755 debian/installmanpages (strange...)

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Wako, Saitama, Japan





-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16farm
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages ncbi-tools6 depends on:
ii  libncbi6                  6.1.20060507-2 NCBI libraries for biology applica

ncbi-tools6 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I did not manage to build the ncbi-tools on a sid/etch mixture
> without downloading the following extra packages:
>
> libx11-dev, libxt-dev, libsm-dev, libice-dev, libxext-dev

I cannot reproduce this in a clean pbuilder chroot (I just tried it),
and Debian's autobuilders ran into no such trouble either.

At any rate, libxmu-dev, which is a build dependency, already directly
or indirectly depends on all of those.  Perhaps you had only partially
upgraded X development packages at first, but I'm not sure how that
would be possible, as current versions (pre)depend on x11-common,
whereas older versions depended on xfree86-common, with which
x11-common conflicts (barring the broken 1:7.0.16 upload, but that was
only in the archive for a couple of days in early May).

> Also, I had to chmod 755 debian/installmanpages (strange...)

You mean debian/installman, right?  This normally happens
automatically, and did both for my pbuilder and for Debian's
autobuilders.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to