Your message dated Thu, 3 Jun 2021 20:54:14 +0200
with message-id <1f823946-984b-3be8-005d-12e4b5b33...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#987504: imagemagick: attempt to perform an operation
not allowed by the security policy `EPS'
has caused the Debian Bug report #987504,
regarding imagemagick: attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the
security policy `EPS'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
987504: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987504
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: imagemagick
Version: 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: found -1 8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1+deb10u1
Control: affects -1 src:ftgl src:foxtrotgps src:gri src:kannel src:mlpost
src:muttprint src:ns3 src:sctk src:texworks-manual src:therion src:vlfeat
src:x4d-icons src:xnee
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/ftgl.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/foxtrotgps.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/gri.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/kannel.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/mlpost.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/muttprint.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/ns3.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/sctk.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/texworks-manual.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/therion.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/vlfeat.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/x4d-icons.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/xnee.html
...
convert-im6.q16: attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security
policy `EPS' @ error/constitute.c/IsCoderAuthorized/408.
convert-im6.q16: attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security
policy `EPS' @ error/constitute.c/IsCoderAuthorized/408.
make[3]: *** [Makefile:931: screenshots/map-download.eps] Error 1
A security change that went just went into imagemagick in unstable,
but already went into imagemagick in buster last autumn,
makes around a dozen packages FTBFS in unstable resp. buster.
Background:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kannel/+bug/1838425
Options are either reverting the imagemagick change or fixing
the packages that got broken in bullseye and buster.
Security and release teams are Cc'ed.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 987504 wontfix
thanks
Hi Moritz, Adrian,
On 03-06-2021 20:00, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Yes, we should not revert this and rather fix fallout in the handful
> of affected packages.
It's really bad we have to do this so late in the cycle, while the
problem was known for so long. Adrian, can you do the bug filing for the
packages that haven't worked around the problem already? I hate it that
the "we should fix" is not us, but "they", the maintainers. We're doing
them a disservice by having this postponed for so long.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
