Your message dated Thu, 20 May 2021 20:22:37 +0000
with message-id <e1ljpbl-000afz...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#988835: fixed in xfig 1:3.2.8-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #988835,
regarding xfig: flaky autopkgtest on ppc64el and s390x: Get the /MediaBox of 
pdf files FAILED (testsuite.at:99)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
988835: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988835
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xfig
Version: 1:3.2.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky

Dear maintainer(s),

Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, I looked into
the history of your autopkgtest [1] on ppc64el (because it is blocking
libx11) and I noticed it fails regularly, while a rerun passes. It
failed once on amd64 with the same error and it fails most of the time
on s390x. I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.

Because the unstable-to-testing migration software now blocks on
regressions in testing, flaky tests, i.e. tests that flip between
passing and failing without changes to the list of installed packages,
are causing people unrelated to your package to spend time on these
tests.

Paul

[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/x/xfig/

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/ppc64el/x/xfig/12468360/log.gz

/bin/bash './testsuite'
## ---------------------- ##
## xfig 3.2.8 test suite. ##
## ---------------------- ##

Rudimentary tests

  1: Report version                                  ok
  2: Validate desktop file                           ok

Integration tests

  3: ignore too many comment lines, ticket #47       skipped
(testsuite.at:59)

Unit tests

  4: Allow coordinates equal to INT_MIN              ok
  5: Test round_coords()                             ok
  6: Get the /MediaBox of pdf files                  ok

## ------------- ##
## Test results. ##
## ------------- ##

5 tests were successful.
1 test was skipped.
make[1]: Leaving directory
'/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.b3uy4jop/downtmp/build.UMw/src/tests'
Running testsuite
/bin/bash './testsuite' AUTOTEST_PATH='/usr/bin'
## ---------------------- ##
## xfig 3.2.8 test suite. ##
## ---------------------- ##

Rudimentary tests

  1: Report version                                  ok
  2: Validate desktop file                           ok

Integration tests

  3: ignore too many comment lines, ticket #47       skipped
(testsuite.at:59)

Unit tests

  4: Allow coordinates equal to INT_MIN              ok
  5: Test round_coords()                             ok
  6: Get the /MediaBox of pdf files                  FAILED
(testsuite.at:99)
ERROR: 5 tests were run,
1 failed unexpectedly.
1 test was skipped.

## ------------- ##
## Test results. ##
## ------------- ##

## -------------------------- ##
## testsuite.log was created. ##
## -------------------------- ##

Please send `tests/testsuite.log' and all information you think might help:

   To: <thomas.loi...@tuwien.ac.at>
   Subject: [xfig 3.2.8] testsuite: 6 failed

You may investigate any problem if you feel able to do so, in which
case the test suite provides a good starting point.  Its output may
be found below `tests/testsuite.dir'.

make: *** [Makefile:639: installcheck-local] Error 1

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xfig
Source-Version: 1:3.2.8-3
Done: Roland Rosenfeld <rol...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfig, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 988...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roland Rosenfeld <rol...@debian.org> (supplier of updated xfig package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 21:14:22 +0200
Source: xfig
Architecture: source
Version: 1:3.2.8-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Roland Rosenfeld <rol...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Roland Rosenfeld <rol...@debian.org>
Closes: 988835
Changes:
 xfig (1:3.2.8-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * testsuite: depend on libgs-dev, so the test does no longer randomly
     fail on gs version output with two dots (Closes: #988835).
Checksums-Sha1:
 65d8feea4f041e1e0cac78d9ffabee75b4b5e91c 2319 xfig_3.2.8-3.dsc
 a9a452f660d0ed00bc7d2f92cb077f779b6a01ac 32440 xfig_3.2.8-3.debian.tar.xz
 c803efcc2b022dc581edc16d1619f9f72fe7368f 8756 xfig_3.2.8-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 e57640cacd7ad6fbb94f681f3372f3f2f2af66d86357c1a035bb2b283131a2b7 2319 
xfig_3.2.8-3.dsc
 eaa6d201ad2deb0018b12a7105f963986a09239804a20e9d6a09e808f9f282a1 32440 
xfig_3.2.8-3.debian.tar.xz
 fa79f8aa14d2117c86630018daab2752173c06f7c5d3b108f408d285df2f7527 8756 
xfig_3.2.8-3_source.buildinfo
Files:
 ee526075862ffbbdb280c28e6c37af7e 2319 graphics optional xfig_3.2.8-3.dsc
 39f084bc151a66d2295d0726f4a1cc08 32440 graphics optional 
xfig_3.2.8-3.debian.tar.xz
 e230c325637f58c87d0e073e966e7968 8756 graphics optional 
xfig_3.2.8-3_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Tj0Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to