Your message dated Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:19:12 +0000 with message-id <e1laqq8-000c0w...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#986339: fixed in universal-ctags 0+git20200824-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #986339, regarding universal-ctags: prerm fails on upgrades to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 986339: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986339 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: universal-ctags Version: 0+git20200824-1.1.g15ce0a8 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 6.4 This is a clean buster container where I tested upgrading universal-ctags: root@1066c7b1da18:/# apt install -qy universal-ctags Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... The following packages will be upgraded: universal-ctags 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 92 not upgraded. Need to get 442 kB of archives. After this operation, 311 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye/main amd64 universal-ctags amd64 0+git20200824-1 [442 kB] Fetched 442 kB in 5s (87.9 kB/s) debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed (Reading database ... 8631 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../universal-ctags_0+git20200824-1_amd64.deb ... prerm called with unknown argument `upgrade' dpkg: warning: old universal-ctags package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1 dpkg: trying script from the new package instead ... dpkg: ... it looks like that went OK Unpacking universal-ctags (0+git20200824-1) over (0+git20181215-2) ... Setting up universal-ctags (0+git20200824-1) ... update-alternatives: using /usr/bin/ctags-universal to provide /usr/bin/etags (etags) in auto mode It seems that dpkg works around the issue somehow, but still prerm should not exit non-zero. The script will also fail similarly when prerm is called with "deconfigure". The attached patch fixes both cases. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: arm64 Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=pt_BR:pt:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages universal-ctags depends on: ii libc6 2.31-10 ii libjansson4 2.13.1-1.1 ii libseccomp2 2.5.1-1 ii libxml2 2.9.10+dfsg-6.3+b1 ii libyaml-0-2 0.2.2-1 universal-ctags recommends no packages. Versions of packages universal-ctags suggests: ii vim 2:8.2.2434-3 ii vim-gtk3 [vim] 2:8.2.2434-3 -- no debconf informationFrom 490f13d5b473059dd873deab5f1f1b64e12f4f40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 17:05:57 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] debian/prerm: handle upgrade/removal scenarios correctly --- debian/prerm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/prerm b/debian/prerm index 6ebf9a2..4b4d130 100644 --- a/debian/prerm +++ b/debian/prerm @@ -3,12 +3,12 @@ set -e case "$1" in - remove) + remove|deconfigure) update-alternatives --remove ctags /usr/bin/ctags-universal update-alternatives --remove etags /usr/bin/ctags-universal ;; - failed-upgrade) + upgrade|failed-upgrade) ;; *) -- 2.31.0
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: universal-ctags Source-Version: 0+git20200824-1.1 Done: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of universal-ctags, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 986...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> (supplier of updated universal-ctags package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:29:07 +0300 Source: universal-ctags Architecture: source Version: 0+git20200824-1.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Alessandro Ghedini <gh...@debian.org> Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> Closes: 986339 Changes: universal-ctags (0+git20200824-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Handle deconfigure and upgrade in the prerm, thanks to Antonio Terceiro. (Closes: #986339) Checksums-Sha1: 0bc42bccb670eaa40d4b6b849b1c2e5b06da3d4a 2063 universal-ctags_0+git20200824-1.1.dsc cc459af91344784fda5a55c9fa0e388b071987b6 5296 universal-ctags_0+git20200824-1.1.debian.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 6d9d09a4c273a0635e0949f2c66e36d38e224561cf49247183e4cdb1b915b0bd 2063 universal-ctags_0+git20200824-1.1.dsc 15cd623cfdfed5168d5db56622c711b914c936fd57a0ad30d535dd3409ddf69a 5296 universal-ctags_0+git20200824-1.1.debian.tar.xz Files: 9a74cecd17d696305e661428633edc00 2063 editors optional universal-ctags_0+git20200824-1.1.dsc f09437662d5001b20d3517acf8b601f9 5296 editors optional universal-ctags_0+git20200824-1.1.debian.tar.xz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEOvp1f6xuoR0v9F3wiNJCh6LYmLEFAmCDLxoACgkQiNJCh6LY mLErJQ//UM6W87mZrp7Pq56UnUxO2Pqv5aL/aa4tx2VYpEiBdviMrg9wudN4yS0e PzGhzPNDBUThNDjDCavOIeGOQz1aXgvhpNx67XYvQczkE8AkecPe31ebrkn+XKUC otBIuGq2mz9q5NFCCXce6+jdPjwtjCm0Qu9xT2vowvAfkTjy/a1IICD/aNAqV1Gt jzHIMGjyITWL2Mf/WQFmS0lTL0Elq4Sij1xx7OjOVnllw1bb5GMQoNtyFx0DWF7U we6ZljbN71kmMkGatiaMswwrAqHpbzQi1VLqFbH7UWYN2K4J4LEpwRQOzIzWdfdS g/YyxcwCn4pi9wwTBuYfjlicM6CTGyTd5krgNEJPlWG4mPY64U3u/331lIn6QbF8 3D+tFebJbrJp6r4DbwFz4BezqtPjlG3AXoV4ijxkQvvKaNRSfiuZj0kPXAKziQh0 Cc0+Y5Yp2FfoqQGzbU2AKU5xpGX7N6yqjDU3zfERpGQwjxXwzoU/uICl2zFUxAA2 Iow6eBg1GNP72ht2Mar8GK0q7kxbX4yNjPXqF6auH8CAgEHC1kQSNSY8qlNGXmJI JvJ7d9sGJkIXirT7cfhZHcnNIXUfz70trRMYCG/ghh2RUHuP2VzvgXNxXBHdHnT2 kYmxz/x4gKIf0uz3Mp3na7M9Gjwq//WCuQViU2ILAFQvGn8rHlg= =Bbui -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
