Your message dated Sun, 21 Mar 2021 18:48:23 -0700
with message-id <ad9b3073-3b85-40ec-9945-d25e133ca...@donarmstrong.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#985675: plover 4.0.0~dev8~66~g685bd33-2 is missing
Conflicts/Replaces plover-common 3.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #985675,
regarding plover 4.0.0~dev8~66~g685bd33-2 is missing Conflicts/Replaces
plover-common 3.0.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
985675: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985675
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: plover
Severity: serious
Version: 4.0.0~dev8~66~g685bd33-2
Preparing to unpack .../2-plover_4.0.0~dev8~66~g685bd33-2_all.deb ...
Unpacking plover (4.0.0~dev8~66~g685bd33-2) over (3.0.0-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-P6rk1s/2-plover_4.0.0~dev8~66~g685bd33-2_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/usr/share/plover/assets/american_english_words.txt',
which is also in package plover-common 3.0.0-1
dpkg-deb: error: paste subprocess was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
plover-common 3.0.0-1 and plover 4.0.0~dev8~66~g685bd33-2 both ship
/usr/share/plover/assets/american_english_words.txt, but the latter is
missing the appropriate Conflicts/Replaces.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
[T]he question of whether Machines Can Think, [...] is about as
relevant as the question of whether Submarines Can Swim.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra "The threats to computing science"
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On March 21, 2021 4:12:09 PM PDT, Harlan Lieberman-Berg <hlieber...@setec.io>
wrote:
>
>I think the 3.0.0 might be dated back to when we were waiting on the
>relicensing to solve the fact that it was undistributable (GPLv2 only
>/ GPLv3 only) and I was trying to figure out the packaging in
>preparation.
>
>Sorry about that!
Ah, that probably explains it. So not really a bug in Debian, then. Closing in
that case. Thanks for the quick response!
--
This is not a signature.
--- End Message ---
