Hi all, On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:04:07 +0000 Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 19:04:49 +0000, Mike Gabriel wrote: > > I saw from other open > > bugs that vinagre upstream is scarcely maintained. Does it make sense to > > ship vinagre in Debian 11? > > I suspect there are people relying on it, but as you say, it's basically > unmaintained upstream. The latest version of src:meta-gnome3 drops it from > Depends down to Suggests, which I think is proportionate.
For reference: vinagre is a key package due to popcon, however, it *can* easily be removed: elbrus@coccia:~$ dak rm --no-action -R --suite testing vinagre Will remove the following packages from testing: vinagre | 3.22.0-8 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers <pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> ------------------- Reason ------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Checking reverse dependencies... No dependency problem found. Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
