Hi Don! On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 03:48:10PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Thu, 04 May 2006, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Daniel Kobras wrote: > > > Furthermore, one might argue that the patch actually modifies the > > > original logo, which is exactly what the license intends to prevent. > > This can happen, but in the meantime we should remove this logo, > > creating a new orig.tar.gz, and then add the free logo back in the > > diff.gz. > I've attached an interdiff for a (yet to be uploaded) NMU which fixes > this bug; it adds a new rule to debian/rules to clean an unpacked > tarball for repacking, and reintroduces the logo patch so that a logo > can still be shown. Because the original logo is no longer included, > it seems clear to me that we are no longer modifying it. > > Daniel: since you've done the last few NMUs I thought I'd include you > in this in case you had an upload in the works; otherwise I will make > an upload in 24 hours to fix this.
Thanks for keeping me in the loop. I don't have an upload pending, so as far as I am concerned, please go ahead. I'm still concerned about the change, though. You're removing the logo first, then add a different one. Are you certain that this is sufficiently distinct from modifying the logo, which is not permitted by the license? Also, can you please add a note to debian/copyright about the logo change? Thanks, Daniel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
