Hi David, On 2/3/21 2:46 PM, David Prévot wrote: > Hi James, > > Le Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 07:05:21PM -0500, James Valleroy a écrit : > […] >> While the packaged shaarli is technically usable, it is missing both >> functionality and styling that would be expected by users. Therefore >> it should be kept out of stable releases until this issue is fixed. > > Given the above (and the freeze schedule), it looks like shaarli won’t > be part of Bullseye. Do you intend to also request the removal of its > (build-)dependencies (e.g., via such kind of RC-bug), or do you intend > to maintain them all during the Bullseye lifetime (wrt security issues)?
I agree with keeping the dependencies out of Bullseye also. I will try to start filing bugs this weekend. Regards, James
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
