A quick summary of the differences between both repos: 1. Source is imported differently. I tried to import source the same way it was done previously.
2. Aluaces package might be missing man pages. Upstream is now using Sphinx instead of Pandoc. I added a patch to build man and updated control. They put doc/*.rst in examples and I put it in doc. I also moved the new example config to `/etc/biboumi/biboumi.cfg` since most packages install example config directly in their final location in `/etc`. 3. I updated copyright hints. 4. My release is marked NMU. Michel Le Bihan Le dimanche 20 décembre 2020 à 15:30 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Vasudev Kamath (2020-12-15 09:35:35) > > > > Hi Alberto, > > > > > I have checked that current upstream (9.0) builds flawlessly, and > > > made my release available at > > > https://salsa.debian.org/aluaces-guest/biboumi . > > > > That is great. > > > > > Can I be sponsored so we can upload to at least experimental? > > > > Sure, please raise a merge request against biboumi and I will try > > to > > review your work and sponsor the upload for you. I would be happy > > if > > you can join us in maintaining biboumi. Both me and Jonas are bit > > busy > > and not getting enough time for maintaining biboumi properly. > > You are following along on this bugreport, right? > > I think it would be helpful if you could give a rough estimate on > when > you expect to find time to review the package update. > > I don't mean to rush it, just suggest to be transparent about the > delay > - I can imagine that Alberto and Michel must be excited to see > progress > on their contributions. > > I must admit that I am a bit confused - seems we now have two > bugfixes > for this issue - first from Alberto and later from Michel who also > wants > to join as co-maintainer - hope you can resolve that, Vasudev :-) > > > - Jonas >
