On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 04:43:55PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 13/12/2020 à 00:38, Markus Koschany a écrit : > > > In this case I believe the RC severity is correct because the arch:any or > > jni > > version of the package FTBFS on ppc64el. We should try to fix the problem on > > ppc64el or, if upstream doesn't support ppc64el, remove the architecture > > from > > the list of supported architectures in debian/control. > > As a side note, if we keep getting issues with service-wrapper-java I > wonder if we could scrap it, systemd is now able to provide similar > auto-restart features for services.
Good idea. The only r-dep I see is i2p, and the popcon graphs [2,3] appear to match pretty closely. I am adding mha...@debian.org to the thread. Perhaps we can update i2p and and drop service-wrapper from bullseye. Cheers, tony [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/i2p [2] https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=service-wrapper-java [3] https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=i2p
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
