Your message dated Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:51:44 -0500
with message-id
<CAOHcdNZP3WdASkUb5Wb=f3g3kuyfg-c2uktl5inag2vhhbh...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #976902,
regarding topydo: provides /usr/bin/todo with incompatible interface compared
to devtodo
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
976902: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976902
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: topydo
Version: 0.13-5
Severity: serious
Example use of `todo` from devtodo:
+---
| Add a task, like so:
|
| $ todo -a I should really update my homepage
|
| List all open tasks:
|
| $ todo
|
| Mark a task as complete:
|
| $ todo -d 1.2
+---[ https://swapoff.org/devtodo1.html ]
Example use of `topydo`:
+---
| topydo add "Water the flowers @Home rec:1w"
| topydo ls
| topydo do 2
+---[ https://github.com/topydo/topydo ]
But postinst registers topydo as an alternative for /usr/bin/todo.
Debian Policy[1] requires binaries with the same name to provide the
same functionality; given the command-line interfaces are
incompatible, this doesn't seem to be the case here.
I've reported this bug against topydo as it seems to just have taken
over the name, but already has topydo and wouldn't need to take over
the todo binary.
Ansgar
[1]: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#binaries
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.14-1
--- End Message ---
