On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 12:59:51AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Adrian,
Hi Norbert, > thanks for your report, that is very much appreciated! > > On Wed, 09 Dec 2020, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > The weird thing about julia is that it built for me on the porterbox, > > and after that it also built in the 4th attempt (sic) on the buildd. > > Mumumu, that is really really difficult. I guess some OOM killer due to > other programs running at the same time. there is nothing else running on the buildds, and the build failure was not an OOM kill. > My guess is that every new julia version will only increase the pressure > on the memory, so I am not all to positive about further support for > armhf. What I actually wanted to try on the porterbox was whether changing the failing "julia -O3" command would help. If I had been able to reproduce this problem, I wanted to check whether changing this to a lower optimization level on armhf would help. armhf likely has some userbase for Julia due to the raspbian, so keeping it available a bit longer there has value for users. > All the best > > Norbert cu Adrian
