Am 05.12.20 um 14:29 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
Source: sword-text-web
Version: 349.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on arm64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64).

Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
diff engWEB2015eb modules/texts/ztext/engWEB2015eb
Binary files engWEB2015eb/nt.bzs and modules/texts/ztext/engWEB2015eb/nt.bzs 
differ
Binary files engWEB2015eb/nt.bzv and modules/texts/ztext/engWEB2015eb/nt.bzv 
differ
Binary files engWEB2015eb/nt.bzz and modules/texts/ztext/engWEB2015eb/nt.bzz 
differ
Binary files engWEB2015eb/ot.bzs and modules/texts/ztext/engWEB2015eb/ot.bzs 
differ
Binary files engWEB2015eb/ot.bzv and modules/texts/ztext/engWEB2015eb/ot.bzv 
differ
Binary files engWEB2015eb/ot.bzz and modules/texts/ztext/engWEB2015eb/ot.bzz 
differ
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:14: override_dh_auto_test-indep] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
    http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/12/05/sword-text-web_349.0-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with me
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.


The build test fails because the package is now built with sword 1.9.0 which produces different output. A better test would be checking on the mod2imp output of the modules if only the version changed. But for now I have just removed the test.

Who wants to sponsor the new version?

Reply via email to