Your message dated Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:28:22 +0000
with message-id <8decdbd9-1c9a-0187-c45b-fc05d12cc...@p10link.net>
and subject line re: rust-sha2: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies:
librust-block-buffer-0.7+default-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #975750,
regarding rust-sha2: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies:
librust-block-buffer-0.7+default-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
975750: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=975750
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rust-sha2
Version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201125 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Install package build dependencies
> |
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
> Setup apt archive
> -----------------
>
> Merged Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 11), dh-cargo (>= 10), cargo, rustc,
> libstd-rust-dev, librust-block-buffer-0.7+default-dev,
> librust-digest-0.8+default-dev, librust-digest-0.8+std-dev,
> librust-fake-simd-0.1+default-dev, librust-opaque-debug-0.2+default-dev,
> build-essential, fakeroot
> Filtered Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 11), dh-cargo (>= 10), cargo, rustc,
> libstd-rust-dev, librust-block-buffer-0.7+default-dev,
> librust-digest-0.8+default-dev, librust-digest-0.8+std-dev,
> librust-fake-simd-0.1+default-dev, librust-opaque-debug-0.2+default-dev,
> build-essential, fakeroot
> dpkg-deb: building package 'sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy' in
> '/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive/sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy.deb'.
> Ign:1 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ InRelease
> Get:2 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Release [957 B]
> Ign:3 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Release.gpg
> Get:4 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Sources [459 B]
> Get:5 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Packages [536 B]
> Fetched 1952 B in 0s (0 B/s)
> Reading package lists...
> Reading package lists...
>
> Install main build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Installing build dependencies
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends:
> librust-block-buffer-0.7+default-dev
> Depends: librust-digest-0.8+default-dev
> but it is not installable
> Depends: librust-digest-0.8+std-dev but it
> is not installable
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> apt-get failed.
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/11/25/rust-sha2_0.8.0-1_unstable.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.2-1
This is fixed in the new version in unstable.
(unfortunately that version has another issue, which I will file a seperate bug
report fo)
--- End Message ---
