Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:26:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370715: init.d script fails to run with lsb-base in testing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: fail2ban
Version: 0.6.1-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
--- /etc/init.d/fail2ban.orig 2006-06-06 16:30:22.760214786 +0200
+++ /etc/init.d/fail2ban 2006-06-06 16:38:44.260607142 +0200
@@ -60,8 +60,10 @@
|| return 1
# we need to remove pid file or fail2ban would refuse to start
# probably check could be ommited but... better be safe
- pidofproc $NAME $PIDFILE > /dev/null
- [ $? -eq 2 ] && rm -rf $PIDFILE
+ if [ -f $PIDFILE ]; then
+ pidofproc $NAME < $PIDFILE > /dev/null
+ [ $? -eq 2 ] && rm -rf $PIDFILE
+ fi
start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE --exec $DAEMON -- \
$DAEMON_ARGS \
|| return 2
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
That is ok, especially since it was reassigned, it was harder to spot it...
I am closing this one as well then -- karma goes up even more ;-)
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.06.1712 +0200]:
> > is this reincarnation of #370256
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=370256
> > reassigned to lsb-base
> > or pidofproc changed its API?
> Looks like it. Sorry I did not check the BTS carefully enough. And
> my mirror was out of sync, thus I did not get the newest package.
> I am just fixing too many bugs all at once while reporting new ones.
--
.-.
=------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------=
Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192
Linux User ^^-^^ [175555]
pgprarASsmVSD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
