Passing through `expand -t 4' and then appending a colon to the `if'
condition of line 371 fixes the problem better than the suggested
"noisy" patch.

Of course, "where there are bugs, there are more bugs": the fact that 
it contained even compile errors shows that the original coder hadn't
tested it at all before submitting.  I haven't tried reviewing the diffs
myself.

pjrm.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to