Your message dated Thu, 12 Nov 2020 21:33:25 +0000
with message-id <e1kdkdd-000gr0...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#974595: fixed in node-snapdragon 0.12.0+repack-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #974595,
regarding node-snapdragon-util: missing Breaks+Replaces: node-snapdragon (<= 
0.12.0+repack-2)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
974595: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974595
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: node-snapdragon-util
Version: 5.0.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to unpack .../node-snapdragon-util_5.0.1-2_all.deb ...
  Unpacking node-snapdragon-util (5.0.1-2) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/node-snapdragon-util_5.0.1-2_all.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/share/nodejs/snapdragon-util/index.js', which is 
also in package node-snapdragon 0.12.0+repack-2
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/node-snapdragon-util_5.0.1-2_all.deb


cheers,

Andreas

Attachment: node-snapdragon=0.12.0+repack-2_node-snapdragon-util=5.0.1-2.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: node-snapdragon
Source-Version: 0.12.0+repack-4
Done: Xavier Guimard <y...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
node-snapdragon, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 974...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Xavier Guimard <y...@debian.org> (supplier of updated node-snapdragon package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 22:09:43 +0100
Source: node-snapdragon
Architecture: source
Version: 0.12.0+repack-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers 
<pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Xavier Guimard <y...@debian.org>
Closes: 974595
Changes:
 node-snapdragon (0.12.0+repack-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   * Fix snapdragon-util install (Closes: #974595)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 bf01a37da0e9e2d19ef50d8aa1f8e8af920cd9f4 3692 
node-snapdragon_0.12.0+repack-4.dsc
 758813baba3afc72984450fe60cfbd34223ab66f 4016 
node-snapdragon_0.12.0+repack-4.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256: 
 111748dea86a776c402565e2d89029addc6140d78f3a4e8acd169ca1a84bfd7a 3692 
node-snapdragon_0.12.0+repack-4.dsc
 666c765944162eda38c60d54361d1ae2869b063808ae968a96dfcb2b46dec7ab 4016 
node-snapdragon_0.12.0+repack-4.debian.tar.xz
Files: 
 db39e1dd5571c65366835cf65692ce09 3692 javascript optional 
node-snapdragon_0.12.0+repack-4.dsc
 1e11470acfaa7b33888ccec6a7011cb5 4016 javascript optional 
node-snapdragon_0.12.0+repack-4.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=IXr6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to