On 06 nov. 2020 09:02, Moritz Muehlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote: [...]
> 966416 was a RoM (Request of maintainer), if the current maintainer wants to > get argyll removed, then you should adopt it instead or make a QA upload, but > you can't simply do an NMU and override the maintainer's request. > > Reopening until Jörg has had a chance to comment. [I forgot to put a Cc to the bug report.] I'm sorry I din't see the RoM and I don't want to adopt argyll again : ,---- | argyll (1.5.1-5) unstable; urgency=low | | * Package orphaned. I don't intent to support the work of an agressive | upstream author more longer and realy good luck for the next maintainer. | | -- Christian Marillat <maril...@debian.org> Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:18:29 +0200 `---- Jörg why a RoM ? Why to not simply orphan this package ? Others people are still using it. Chirstian
