Hi! Just to clarify why I prefer the second solution, I think what debian does is shipping precompiled versions of extensions, so technically the gemspec shipped in the debian should include no extensions at all. This is something some upstream gems already do. Take, for example, google-protobuf. It has a precompiled version for linux: https://rubygems.org/gems/google-protobuf/versions/3.13.0-x86_64-linux. If we fetch and unpack this package, we can see it includes the prebuilt `.so` extension, but no extensions in its gemspec:
$ gem fetch google-protobuf Fetching google-protobuf-3.13.0-x86_64-linux.gem Downloaded google-protobuf-3.13.0-x86_64-linux $ gem unpack google-protobuf-3.13.0-x86_64-linux.gem Unpacked gem: '/home/deivid/Code/playground/google-protobuf-3.13.0-x86_64-linux' $ find google-protobuf-3.13.0-x86_64-linux -name '*.so' google-protobuf-3.13.0-x86_64-linux/lib/google/2.6/protobuf_c.so google-protobuf-3.13.0-x86_64-linux/lib/google/2.4/protobuf_c.so google-protobuf-3.13.0-x86_64-linux/lib/google/2.7/protobuf_c.so google-protobuf-3.13.0-x86_64-linux/lib/google/2.5/protobuf_c.so google-protobuf-3.13.0-x86_64-linux/lib/google/2.3/protobuf_c.so $ gem unpack google-protobuf-3.13.0-x86_64-linux.gem --spec && grep extensions google-protobuf-3.13.0-x86_64-linux.gemspec extensions: [] I think the cleanest solution would be for debian to do the same thing.