Your message dated Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:46:42 +0800 with message-id <13dc60776b15fe62310d54aed5b92...@debian.org> and subject line Re: petsc4py breaks slepc4py autopkgtest: No module named 'petsc4py' has caused the Debian Bug report #970857, regarding petsc4py breaks slepc4py autopkgtest: No module named 'petsc4py' to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 970857: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970857 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: petsc4py, slepc4py Control: found -1 petsc4py/3.13.0-8 Control: found -1 slepc4py/3.13.0-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of petsc4py the autopkgtest of slepc4py fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of petsc4py from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In tabular form: pass fail petsc4py from testing 3.13.0-8 slepc4py from testing 3.13.0-4 versioned deps [0] from testing from unstable all others from testing from testing I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. Currently this regression is blocking the migration of petsc4py to testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and reassign the bug to the right package? More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation Paul [0] You can see what packages were added from the second line of the log file quoted below. The migration software adds source package from unstable to the list if they are needed to install packages from petsc4py/3.13.0-8. I.e. due to versioned dependencies or breaks/conflicts. [1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=petsc4py https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/s/slepc4py/7159911/log.gz autopkgtest [02:27:47]: test run-demos-64: [----------------------- Running slepc4py demos using SLEPC_DIR=/usr/lib/slepc64 PETSC_DIR=/usr/lib/petsc64 Run 64-bit demos (single processor) with python3 make: Entering directory '/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.7qqowpar/downtmp/build.3jI/src/test-demos' python3 ex1.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "ex1.py", line 2, in <module> slepc4py.init(sys.argv) File "/usr/lib/slepc64/lib/python3/dist-packages/slepc4py/__init__.py", line 40, in init import slepc4py.lib File "/usr/lib/slepc64/lib/python3/dist-packages/slepc4py/lib/__init__.py", line 24, in <module> from petsc4py.lib import ImportPETSc ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'petsc4py' make: *** [makefile:11: run_ex1] Error 1 make: Leaving directory '/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.7qqowpar/downtmp/build.3jI/src/test-demos' autopkgtest [02:27:47]: test run-demos-64: -----------------------]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Control: fixed -1 3.13.0-5 Close.
--- End Message ---
