Your message dated Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:03:27 +0000
with message-id <e1klo63-0008ge...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#970844: fixed in luacheck 0.24.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #970844,
regarding lua-check: Unusable due to incomplete packaging
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
970844: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970844
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lua-check
Version: 0.24.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

just starting lua-check version 0.24 on any lua source file results in the
following error messages:

lua5.1: /usr/share/lua/5.1/luacheck/options.lua:3: module
'luacheck.builtin_standards' not found:
        no field package.preload['luacheck.builtin_standards']
        no file './luacheck/builtin_standards.lua'
        no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/luacheck/builtin_standards.lua'
        no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/luacheck/builtin_standards/init.lua'
        no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/luacheck/builtin_standards.lua'
        no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/luacheck/builtin_standards/init.lua'
        no file '/usr/share/lua/5.1/luacheck/builtin_standards.lua'
        no file '/usr/share/lua/5.1/luacheck/builtin_standards/init.lua'
        no file './luacheck/builtin_standards.so'
        no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/luacheck/builtin_standards.so'
        no file '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
gnu/lua/5.1/luacheck/builtin_standards.so'
        no file '/usr/lib/lua/5.1/luacheck/builtin_standards.so'
        no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/loadall.so'
        no file './luacheck.so'
        no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/luacheck.so'
        no file '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lua/5.1/luacheck.so'
        no file '/usr/lib/lua/5.1/luacheck.so'
        no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/loadall.so'
stack traceback:
        [C]: in function 'require'
        /usr/share/lua/5.1/luacheck/options.lua:3: in main chunk
        [C]: in function 'require'
        ...are/lua/5.1/luacheck/stages/parse_inline_options.lua:1: in main
chunk
        [C]: in function 'require'
        /usr/share/lua/5.1/luacheck/serializer.lua:1: in main chunk
        [C]: in function 'require'
        /usr/share/lua/5.1/luacheck/cache.lua:2: in main chunk
        [C]: in function 'require'
        /usr/share/lua/5.1/luacheck/main.lua:2: in main chunk
        [C]: in function 'require'
        /usr/bin/luacheck:2: in main chunk
        [C]: ?

The new version has two new subdirectories, which are not packaged:

- src/luacheck/builtin_standards
- src/luacheck/vendor

Please fix the package by adding this subdirectories to the package.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.8.10 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_USER
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages lua-check depends on:
ii  lua-argparse    0.6.0-1
ii  lua-filesystem  1.8.0-1
ii  lua5.1          5.1.5-8.1+b3

lua-check recommends no packages.

lua-check suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: luacheck
Source-Version: 0.24.0-2
Done: Victor Seva <vs...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
luacheck, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 970...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Victor Seva <vs...@debian.org> (supplier of updated luacheck package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:19:28 +0200
Source: luacheck
Architecture: source
Version: 0.24.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Victor Seva <vs...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Victor Seva <vs...@debian.org>
Closes: 970844
Changes:
 luacheck (0.24.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * fix find lua files (Closes: #970844)
Checksums-Sha1:
 94dedde4a6431a770b413babe3a1a75f795935fd 1611 luacheck_0.24.0-2.dsc
 477ffee0467b8053a0af5a93df0f3aeaac5d6ab9 3368 luacheck_0.24.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 bd24a4228abc22bdc18801af73403de287904f9c 7019 luacheck_0.24.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 1359b38d9661cc85a945b1618b638f0f2a9bd3d0083cf4bffe41563c1021b339 1611 
luacheck_0.24.0-2.dsc
 7893e6562341e597d1a3bb70674ed10da23fcecde7330100d717577f55eef71b 3368 
luacheck_0.24.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 db2a6a24f9a41135ea72675f5b9aaf83f18e42ae52fce7ade9408e38873114e3 7019 
luacheck_0.24.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 932842dc77b4ed2a57f56134ab161986 1611 interpreters optional 
luacheck_0.24.0-2.dsc
 59c5a52352c201c68647d90efd2a9029 3368 interpreters optional 
luacheck_0.24.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 880f779b1d572fc9c368231898c2f3c3 7019 interpreters optional 
luacheck_0.24.0-2_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFFBAEBCgAvFiEEDmBQEMrYIhRFqKAgIXSmjn2oLMcFAl9sawIRHHZzZXZhQGRl
Ymlhbi5vcmcACgkQIXSmjn2oLMe95gf/eyXfWkzYxabUbE1Ix/nevGYi0GteG/LS
pHcVu1PaZztl+so+eOXTsD88dPZP/kCgpeyKwvFkpR7cXxA+cDFWMSqhnRwzHgtT
zK6HQ5T1NvVWmQaK/iuvM67HpFjbOHt9eS06cGNlX8y+Ivs8t2svPCncsJNXEwOD
54nsJYoH59TwQpbr8h50XQTGyEdi9dYadCq/IFpHaCcEgkg8BWqERSffyXSlYg88
CIPFwFS/TnLiubcSWC+OrrPFVqIDR2pqLd4wWpei1Gf00vizWeb4K1WdyHH4fsNa
WQ/9Er8i4w1YC/qDKhgsMR/T4Mcvtv7zhOMr08p4vTwdmpn8b+d1Gw==
=eJnG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to