Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 02:03:03PM +1200, Srdjan wrote:
I don't have /usr/lib/libGL.so on my system. I have
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-06-01 09:40 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 ->
libGL.so.1.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 447560 2006-05-29 14:56 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2
What does dpkg -S /usr/lib/libGL.so show?
diversion by nvidia-glx from: /usr/lib/libGL.so
diversion by nvidia-glx to: /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.xlibmesa
But I've removed nvidia-glx long time ago (replaced with nvidia-glx-legacy, and
then removed that one too because switched to a box with an i810)
My understanding is that libgl1-mesa-dev creates a symlink to
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1, and that the error is thrown when that fails.
there's no sane reason why creating this symlink should fail on any proper
Unix filesystem.
Only if the directory path in the link name is non-existant. Ln could't care
less if the target is there or not.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
