Source: ros-rospack Version: 2.6.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200620 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[5]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build' > make[5]: Nothing to be done for 'CMakeFiles/run_tests.dir/build'. > make[5]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build' > [100%] Built target run_tests > make[4]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build' > /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_start /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build/CMakeFiles 0 > make[3]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build' > make[2]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build' > catkin_test_results > build/test_results/rospack/gtest-rospack-utest.xml: 10 tests, 0 errors, 6 > failures, 0 skipped > Summary: 10 tests, 0 errors, 6 failures, 0 skipped > make[1]: *** [debian/rules:8: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/06/20/ros-rospack_2.6.2-1_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
